Vol. 81, Issue 3

SYMPOSIUM:
A Symposium on The People Themselves: Popular Constitutionalism and Judicial Review

SYMPOSIUM EDITOR
Daniel W. Hamilton

TABLE OF CONTENTS AND ARTICLE ABSTRACTS

INTRODUCTION
Daniel W. Hamilton

A HISTORIOGRAPHY OF THE PEOPLE THEMSELVES AND POPULAR CONSTITUTIONALISM
Morton J. Horwitz

A DISCRETE AND COSMOPOLITAN MINORITY: THE LOYALISTS, THE ATLANTIC WORLD, AND THE ORIGINS OF JUDICIAL REVIEW
Daniel J. Hulsebosch

IREDELL RECLAIMED: FAREWELL TO SNOWISS’S HISTORY OF JUDICIAL REVIEW
Gerald Leonard

MOBS, MILITIAS, AND MAGISTRATES: POPULAR CONSTITUTIONALISM AND THE WHISKEY REBELLION
Saul Cornell

PRE-REVOLUTIONARY POPULAR CONSTITUTIONALISM AND LARRY KRAMER’S THE PEOPLE THEMSELVES
Richard J. Ross

GIVE “THE PEOPLE” WHAT THEY WANT
Keith E. Whittington

POPULAR CONSTITUTIONALISM, JUDICIAL SUPREMACY, AND THE COMPLETE LINCOLN-DOUGLAS DEBATES
Mark A. Graber

POPULAR CONSTITUTIONALISM IN THE CIVIL WAR: A TRIAL RUN
Daniel W. Hamilton

POPULAR CONSTITUTIONALISM IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY: Reflections on the Dark Side, the Progressive Constitutional Imagination, and the Enduring Role of Judicial Finality in Popular Understandings of Popular Self-Rule
William E. Forbath

POPULAR CONSTITUTIONALISM AS POLITICAL LAW
Mark Tushnet

POLITICS, POLICE, PAST AND PRESENT: LARRY KRAMER’S THE PEOPLE THEMSELVES
Christopher Tomlins

PREEMPTING THE PEOPLE: THE JUDICIAL ROLE IN REGULATORY CONCURRENCY AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR POPULAR LAWMAKING
Theodore W. Ruger

TOM DELAY: POPULAR CONSTITUTIONALIST?
Neal Devins

POPULAR CONSTITUTIONALISM AS PRESIDENTIAL CONSTITUTIONALISM?
David L. Franklin

CONSTITUTIONAL EDUCATION FOR THE PEOPLE THEMSELVES
Sheldon Nahmod

COMMENT: POPULAR LAW AND THE DOUBTFUL CASE RULE
Frank I. Michelman

KRAMER’S POPULAR CONSTITUTIONALISM: A QUICK NORMATIVE ASSESSMENT
Sarah Harding

KATRINA, THE CONSTITUTION, AND THE LEGAL QUESTION DOCTRINE
Robin West

RESPONSE
Larry Kramer

STUDENT NOTES

“LEWD AND IMMORAL”: NUDE DANCING, SEXUAL EXPRESSION, AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT
Kevin Case

THE USES OF HISTORY IN THE SUPREME COURT’S TAKINGS CLAUSE JURISPRUDENCE
Jonathan Lahn