{"id":6161,"date":"2020-07-03T14:41:30","date_gmt":"2020-07-03T19:41:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\/ckjip\/?p=6161"},"modified":"2020-07-03T14:56:12","modified_gmt":"2020-07-03T19:56:12","slug":"can-artificial-intelligence-be-named-as-inventors-for-patents","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\/ckjip\/can-artificial-intelligence-be-named-as-inventors-for-patents\/","title":{"rendered":"Can Artificial Intelligence Be Named as Inventors for Patents?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>By: Elissa Tenenbaum<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Artificial intelligence (AI) is complex software that makes decisions with the help of some human input; its three main qualities are intentionality, intelligence, and adaptability. <a href=\"#_edn1\" name=\"_ednref1\">[1]<\/a> AI is a quickly growing industry; the global AI market size is expected to reach 390.9 billion USD by 2025. <a href=\"#_edn2\" name=\"_ednref2\">[2]<\/a> Undoubtedly, AI is and will continue to be a key driver of new technology. <a href=\"#_edn3\" name=\"_ednref3\">[3]<\/a> AI encompasses a high level of precision and accuracy and is advantageous in numerous fields, such as banking, manufacturing, weather forecasting, and predicting natural disasters. <a href=\"#_edn4\" name=\"_ednref4\">[4]<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Currently, the USPTO is requesting comments from the public on patent-related AI issues. <a href=\"#_edn5\" name=\"_ednref5\">[5]<\/a> As AI is used more to create inventions, AI inventorship becomes an increasingly pressing issue that should either be addressed by the courts, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), and\/or Congress.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Who should be named as an inventor for an AI-created invention? Can AI be named as inventor? Can the creators of an AI robot be named as the inventors? Can AI-created inventions be patented at all?<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong><em>Progress Clause of the Constitution<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The Progress Clause of the Constitution states that Congress has the power \u201c[t]o Promote the Progress of Science and the useful Arts by securing for limited times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive right to their respective writings and discoveries.\u201d <a href=\"#_edn6\" name=\"_ednref6\">[6]<\/a> Allowing AI-created inventions to be patented would promote the progress of science.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong><em>The Statutory Text Regarding AI <\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Congress has not directly addressed AI inventorship. The Patent Act defines an \u201cinventor\u201d as \u201cthe individual . . . who invented or discovered the subject matter of the invention.\u201d <a href=\"#_edn7\" name=\"_ednref7\">[7]<\/a> This definition does not explicitly prohibit AI from being named as inventors. However, there are other sections in the Patent Act where \u201cperson\u201d is used. <a href=\"#_edn8\" name=\"_ednref8\">[8]<\/a> One may argue that since Congress used \u201cperson\u201d throughout the Patent Act, they intended for the statute to include only include humans, specifically regarding inventorship. On the other hand, the lack of \u201cperson\u201d in the inventorship definition may suggest that Congress intended to leave it broad and more inclusive. <a href=\"#_edn9\" name=\"_ednref9\">[9]<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong><em>The Courts\u2019 Interpretation of the Patent Act<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>U.S. courts have also not directly addressed AI inventorship. To determine inventorship is fact specific, and there is no bright-line standard for every case. <a href=\"#_edn10\" name=\"_ednref10\">[10]<\/a> However, the Federal Circuit provided guidelines for what constitutes inventorship: \u201c\u2018Conception is the touchstone of inventorship.\u2019\u201d <a href=\"#_edn11\" name=\"_ednref11\">[11]<\/a> In addition, conception requires \u201cthat the inventor appreciate that which he has invented.\u201d <a href=\"#_edn12\" name=\"_ednref12\">[12]<\/a> An inventor must \u201cmake a contribution to the conception of the subject matter of a claim.\u201d <a href=\"#_edn13\" name=\"_ednref13\">[13]<\/a> However, a company cannot be named as an inventor. <a href=\"#_edn14\" name=\"_ednref14\">[14]<\/a> The Federal Circuit further defined an inventor as \u201ca competent witness to explain the invention and what was intended to be conveyed by the specification and covered by the claims.\u201d <a href=\"#_edn15\" name=\"_ednref15\">[15]<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Is AI capable of conceiving an invention? Do the creators of the AI satisfy the conception requirement for an AI-created invention?<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>AI is self-learning and intelligent; it can create an invention. <a href=\"#_edn16\" name=\"_ednref16\">[16]<\/a> AI likely fulfills the conception requirement for inventorship. Humans may be too far removed from the inventorship process of an AI-created invention. They may not have created the subject matter covered by the patent or may not even know how the invention works. At the moment, humans have to at least provide AI basic mathematical parameters. Yet, AI is closer than a human to conceiving the subject matter of an AI-created invention. If the courts were to determine that AI can be named an inventor, joint-inventorship is also an option.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong><em>Rights in Other Areas of Intellectual Property Law<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>In Naruto v. Slater, a monkey took pictures of itself by simply pressing a camera button, and the court held that animals do not have standing to sue because the Copyright Act did not explicitly extend the concept of authorship or statutory standing to animals. <a href=\"#_edn17\" name=\"_ednref17\">[17]<\/a> However, AI is far more intelligent and capable of performing complex tasks than animals.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>In addition, the Copyright Act specifically mentions the word \u201chumans.\u201d <a href=\"#_edn18\" name=\"_ednref18\">[18]<\/a> However, the Patent Act does not specifically mention \u201chumans.\u201d <a href=\"#_edn19\" name=\"_ednref19\">[19]<\/a> This also suggests that Congress intended to keep the patent inventorship definition broad, and AI can be included in that definition.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong><em>Other Countries\u2019 Decisions<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The European Patent Office (EPO) recently decided that AI cannot be an inventor for a European patent application. <a href=\"#_edn20\" name=\"_ednref20\">[20]<\/a> An inventor must be a \u201cnatural person.\u201d <a href=\"#_edn21\" name=\"_ednref21\">[21]<\/a> The EPO indicated that their decision is consistent with the European national and the international consensus, including the US, that inventors are human beings. <a href=\"#_edn22\" name=\"_ednref22\">[22]<\/a> If the US were to look to the EPO for guidance, AI cannot be named as an inventor for US patents.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong><em>Patent Ownership<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>If AI was able to be named an inventor, their employer would still be able to own the acquired patent because they could be named the Assignee <a href=\"#_edn23\" name=\"_ednref23\">[23]<\/a> Since a business could own an invention created by AI, allowing AI inventorship would not be detrimental to one\u2019s business, and companies will continue to invest in AI. This would be consistent with one of patent law\u2019s main goal, incentivizing innovation.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>On the other hand, if the human behind AI named the inventor, this would also promote incentivizing innovation. However, an issue of fairness may arise because as AI advances, it will likely be more able than humans to create inventions. Would it be fair to allow an inventor who coded an AI robot to take credit and profit from all of the AI robot\u2019s inventions? This is an issue that either the courts, the USPTO, or Congress must consider.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong><em>Conclusion<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>An individual must be able to be named as an inventor for AI-created inventions because otherwise, these inventions cannot be patented. This would prohibit innovation and disincentivize companies to use AI. The current most practical solution is to allow the humans behind AI to be named the inventors. This would not conflict with the current statutes, including the Patent Act, and court decisions that use the word \u201cperson\u201d and \u201chuman.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"#_ednref1\" name=\"_edn1\">[1]<\/a><em>See<\/em> Darrell M. West, <em>What is artificial intelligence? <\/em>, Brookings, (Oct. 4, 2018), https:\/\/www.brookings.edu\/research\/what-is-artificial-intelligence\/.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"#_ednref2\" name=\"\u201d_edn2\">[2]<\/a><em>Global Artificial Intelligence (AI) Market Size, Share &amp; Trends Analysis 2018-2025<\/em>, GlobeNewswire, (Feb. 10, 2020), https:\/\/www.globenewswire.com\/news-release\/2020\/02\/10\/1982156\/0\/en\/Global-Artificial-Intelligence-AI-Market-Size-Share-Trends-Analysis-2018-2025.html.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"#_ednref3\" name=\"_edn3\">[3]<\/a><em>See<\/em> Kashyap Vyas, <em>7 Ways AI Will Help Humanity, Not Harm It<\/em>, Interesting Engineering, (Dec. 3, 2018), https:\/\/ interestingengineering.com\/7-ways-ai-will-help-humanity-not-harm-it.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"#_ednref4\" name=\"_edn4\">[4]<\/a><em>Id<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"#_ednref5\" name=\"_edn5\">[5]<\/a>USPTO, <em>Request for Comments on Patenting Artificial Intelligence Inventions<\/em>, Federal Register (Aug. 27, 2019), https:\/\/www.federalregister.gov\/documents\/2019\/08\/27\/2019-18443\/request-for-comments-on-patenting-artificial-intelligence-inventions.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"#_ednref6\" name=\"_edn6\">[6]<\/a>U.S. Const. art. I, \u00a78, cl. 8.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"#_ednref7\" name=\"_edn7\">[7]<\/a>35 U.S.C. \u00a7 100(f).<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"#_ednref8\" name=\"_edn8\">[8]<\/a><em>See<\/em> 35 U.S.C. \u00a7 102(a) (\u201cA <em>person<\/em> shall be entitled to a patent . . .\u201d) (emphasis added); <em>see also<\/em> 35 U.S.C. \u00a7 116(a) (\u201cWhen an invention is made by two or more persons jointly. . .\u201d) (emphasis added).<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"#_ednref9\" name=\"_edn9\">[9]<\/a>See Tina G. Yin Sowatzke, <em>Meet DABUS: An Artificial Intelligence Machine Hoping to Maintain Two Patent Applications in its own Name<\/em>, Lexology (Aug. 22, 2019), https:\/\/www.lexology.com\/library\/ (\u201cAI has the functionality to fulfill the act of conception, supporting inventorship, and denying such rights to AI could deter AI developers and hinder innovation\u201d).<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"#_ednref10\" name=\"_edn10\">[10]<\/a><em>CODA Dev. S.R.O. v. Goodyear Tire &amp; Rubber Co.<\/em>, 916 F.3d 1350, 1359 (Fed. Cir. 2019).<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"#_ednref11\" name=\"_edn11\">[11]<\/a><em>CODA Dev. Supra<\/em> note 6, at 1358\u201359 (citation omitted).<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"#_ednref12\" name=\"_edn12\">[12]<\/a><em>Invitrogen Corp. v. Clontech Laboratories, Inc.<\/em>, 429 F.3d 1052, 1063 (Fed. Cir. 2005).<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"#_ednref13\" name=\"_edn13\">[13]<\/a><em>Eli Lilly and Co.<\/em>, 376 F.3d at 1362.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"#_ednref14\" name=\"_edn14\">[14]<\/a><em>New Idea Farm Equipment Corp. v. Sperry Corp.<\/em>, 916 F.2d 1561, 1566 n.4 (Fed. Cir. 1990) (agreeing with the district court\u2019s recognition that only \u201cpeople conceive, not companies\u201d and finding that the company\u2019s engineer, not the company, was the inventor).<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"#_ednref15\" name=\"_edn15\">[15]<\/a><em>Voice Techs. Group v. VMC Sys., Inc.<\/em>, 164 F.3d 605, 615 (Fed. Cir. 1999) (\u201cPatents are written . . . for and by persons experienced in the field of the invention\u201d).<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"#_ednref16\" name=\"_edn16\">[16]<\/a>Hugh Howey, <em>How to Build a Self-Conscious Machine<\/em>, Wired, (Oct. 4, 2017), https:\/\/www.wired.com\/story\/how-to-build-a-self-conscious-ai-machine\/.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"#_ednref17\" name=\"_edn17\">[17]<\/a><em>Naruto v. Slater<\/em>, 2016 WL 362231, at *1, *3 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 28, 2016), aff\u2019d, 888 F.3d 418 (9th Cir. 2018).<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"#_ednref18\" name=\"_edn18\">[18]<\/a><em>Id<\/em>. at *3.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"#_ednref19\" name=\"_edn19\">[19]<\/a><em>See, e.g., Invitrogen Corp.<\/em>, 429 F.3d at 1063 (\u201c[C]onception requires that the inventor appreciate that which he has invented\u201d); Ethicon, 135 F.3d at 1460 (\u201cConception is the formation in the mind of the inventor\u201d) (internal quotations omitted).<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"#_ednref20\" name=\"_edn20\">[20]<\/a>FRKelly, <em>Can computers invent? EPO says no to AI inventors<\/em>, Lexology, (Feb. 13, 2020), https:\/\/www.lexology.com\/library\/detail.aspx?g=59cea15e-d89a-4c89-9029-3b2619a952c4.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"#_ednref21\" name=\"_edn21\">[21]<\/a><em>Id<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"#_ednref22\" name=\"_edn22\">[22]<\/a><em>Id<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"#_ednref23\" name=\"_edn23\">[23]<\/a><em>See<\/em> Pamela Samuelson, <em>Allocating Ownership Rights in Computer-Generated Works<\/em>, 47 U. Pitt. L. Rev. 1185 (1985) (\u201callocating rights in computer-generated output to the user of the generator program is the soundest solution\u201d).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>By: Elissa Tenenbaum &nbsp; Artificial intelligence (AI) is complex software that makes decisions with the help of some human input; its three main qualities are intentionality, intelligence, and adaptability. [1] AI is a quickly growing industry; the global AI market size is expected to reach 390.9 billion USD by 2025. &#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6161","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-journal-blog","column","twocol"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v28.4 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Can Artificial Intelligence Be Named as Inventors for Patents? - Chicago-Kent | Journal of Intellectual Property<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\/ckjip\/can-artificial-intelligence-be-named-as-inventors-for-patents\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Can Artificial Intelligence Be Named as Inventors for Patents? - Chicago-Kent | Journal of Intellectual Property\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"By: Elissa Tenenbaum &nbsp; Artificial intelligence (AI) is complex software that makes decisions with the help of some human input; its three &#8230;\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\/ckjip\/can-artificial-intelligence-be-named-as-inventors-for-patents\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Chicago-Kent | Journal of Intellectual Property\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ckjournalip\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-07-03T19:41:30+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-07-03T19:56:12+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Journal Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@CKJIP\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@CKJIP\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Journal Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\\\/ckjip\\\/can-artificial-intelligence-be-named-as-inventors-for-patents\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\\\/ckjip\\\/can-artificial-intelligence-be-named-as-inventors-for-patents\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Journal Editor\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\\\/ckjip\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/c3e1e382abe28550f820e5af0296d947\"},\"headline\":\"Can Artificial Intelligence Be Named as Inventors for Patents?\",\"datePublished\":\"2020-07-03T19:41:30+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-07-03T19:56:12+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\\\/ckjip\\\/can-artificial-intelligence-be-named-as-inventors-for-patents\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1400,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\\\/ckjip\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Journal Blog\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\\\/ckjip\\\/can-artificial-intelligence-be-named-as-inventors-for-patents\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\\\/ckjip\\\/can-artificial-intelligence-be-named-as-inventors-for-patents\\\/\",\"name\":\"Can Artificial Intelligence Be Named as Inventors for Patents? - Chicago-Kent | Journal of Intellectual Property\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\\\/ckjip\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2020-07-03T19:41:30+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-07-03T19:56:12+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\\\/ckjip\\\/can-artificial-intelligence-be-named-as-inventors-for-patents\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\\\/ckjip\\\/can-artificial-intelligence-be-named-as-inventors-for-patents\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\\\/ckjip\\\/can-artificial-intelligence-be-named-as-inventors-for-patents\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\\\/ckjip\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Can Artificial Intelligence Be Named as Inventors for Patents?\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\\\/ckjip\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\\\/ckjip\\\/\",\"name\":\"Chicago-Kent | Journal of Intellectual Property\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\\\/ckjip\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\\\/ckjip\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\\\/ckjip\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\\\/ckjip\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\\\/ckjip\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\\\/ckjip\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/4\\\/2011\\\/11\\\/MainLogo.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\\\/ckjip\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/4\\\/2011\\\/11\\\/MainLogo.png\",\"width\":1127,\"height\":176,\"caption\":\"Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\\\/ckjip\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/ckjournalip\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/CKJIP\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\\\/ckjip\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/c3e1e382abe28550f820e5af0296d947\",\"name\":\"Journal Editor\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\\\/ckjip\\\/author\\\/ckjipeditor\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Can Artificial Intelligence Be Named as Inventors for Patents? - Chicago-Kent | Journal of Intellectual Property","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\/ckjip\/can-artificial-intelligence-be-named-as-inventors-for-patents\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Can Artificial Intelligence Be Named as Inventors for Patents? - Chicago-Kent | Journal of Intellectual Property","og_description":"By: Elissa Tenenbaum &nbsp; Artificial intelligence (AI) is complex software that makes decisions with the help of some human input; its three &#8230;","og_url":"https:\/\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\/ckjip\/can-artificial-intelligence-be-named-as-inventors-for-patents\/","og_site_name":"Chicago-Kent | Journal of Intellectual Property","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ckjournalip","article_published_time":"2020-07-03T19:41:30+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-07-03T19:56:12+00:00","author":"Journal Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@CKJIP","twitter_site":"@CKJIP","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Journal Editor","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\/ckjip\/can-artificial-intelligence-be-named-as-inventors-for-patents\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\/ckjip\/can-artificial-intelligence-be-named-as-inventors-for-patents\/"},"author":{"name":"Journal Editor","@id":"https:\/\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\/ckjip\/#\/schema\/person\/c3e1e382abe28550f820e5af0296d947"},"headline":"Can Artificial Intelligence Be Named as Inventors for Patents?","datePublished":"2020-07-03T19:41:30+00:00","dateModified":"2020-07-03T19:56:12+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\/ckjip\/can-artificial-intelligence-be-named-as-inventors-for-patents\/"},"wordCount":1400,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\/ckjip\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Journal Blog"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\/ckjip\/can-artificial-intelligence-be-named-as-inventors-for-patents\/","url":"https:\/\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\/ckjip\/can-artificial-intelligence-be-named-as-inventors-for-patents\/","name":"Can Artificial Intelligence Be Named as Inventors for Patents? - Chicago-Kent | Journal of Intellectual Property","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\/ckjip\/#website"},"datePublished":"2020-07-03T19:41:30+00:00","dateModified":"2020-07-03T19:56:12+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\/ckjip\/can-artificial-intelligence-be-named-as-inventors-for-patents\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\/ckjip\/can-artificial-intelligence-be-named-as-inventors-for-patents\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\/ckjip\/can-artificial-intelligence-be-named-as-inventors-for-patents\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\/ckjip\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Can Artificial Intelligence Be Named as Inventors for Patents?"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\/ckjip\/#website","url":"https:\/\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\/ckjip\/","name":"Chicago-Kent | Journal of Intellectual Property","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\/ckjip\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\/ckjip\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\/ckjip\/#organization","name":"Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property","url":"https:\/\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\/ckjip\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\/ckjip\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\/ckjip\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2011\/11\/MainLogo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\/ckjip\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2011\/11\/MainLogo.png","width":1127,"height":176,"caption":"Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\/ckjip\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ckjournalip","https:\/\/x.com\/CKJIP"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\/ckjip\/#\/schema\/person\/c3e1e382abe28550f820e5af0296d947","name":"Journal Editor","url":"https:\/\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\/ckjip\/author\/ckjipeditor\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\/ckjip\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6161","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\/ckjip\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\/ckjip\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\/ckjip\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\/ckjip\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6161"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\/ckjip\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6161\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6168,"href":"https:\/\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\/ckjip\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6161\/revisions\/6168"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\/ckjip\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6161"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\/ckjip\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6161"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\/ckjip\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6161"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}