{"id":4481,"date":"2016-09-06T16:17:52","date_gmt":"2016-09-06T16:17:52","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/wistful-signature.flywheelsites.com\/cklawreview\/?page_id=4481"},"modified":"2018-10-25T22:55:18","modified_gmt":"2018-10-26T03:55:18","slug":"dignity-takings-dignity-restoration","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\/cklawreview\/symposium\/dignity-takings-dignity-restoration\/","title":{"rendered":"Dignity Takings | Dignity Restoration"},"content":{"rendered":"<h3 style=\"text-align: center\"><a href=\"https:\/\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\/cklawreview\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2016\/09\/Dignity-Header.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-13940\" src=\"https:\/\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\/cklawreview\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2016\/09\/Dignity-Header.jpg\" alt=\"Dignity Header\" width=\"1200\" height=\"848\" srcset=\"https:\/\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\/cklawreview\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2016\/09\/Dignity-Header.jpg 1200w, https:\/\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\/cklawreview\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2016\/09\/Dignity-Header-300x212.jpg 300w, https:\/\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\/cklawreview\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2016\/09\/Dignity-Header-768x543.jpg 768w, https:\/\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\/cklawreview\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2016\/09\/Dignity-Header-1024x724.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\/cklawreview\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2016\/09\/Dignity-Header-700x495.jpg 700w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1200px) 100vw, 1200px\" \/><\/a><\/h3>\n<h1 style=\"font-variant: small-caps;text-align: center\"><\/h1>\n<h1 style=\"font-variant: small-caps;text-align: center\">2016 Chicago-Kent Law Review Live Symposium<\/h1>\n<h2 style=\"text-align: center\">Dignity Takings | Dignity Restoration<\/h2>\n<hr \/>\n<h3 style=\"text-align: center\">Symposium Editor<\/h3>\n<p style=\"text-align: center\"><strong>Professor Bernadette Atuahene, IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law<\/strong><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p><a style=\"margin: 0\" href=\"https:\/\/kentlaw.hosted.panopto.com\/Panopto\/Pages\/Viewer.aspx?id=ab7747d7-72fd-4a58-aae5-8da561478a4a\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-4555 alignright\" src=\"https:\/\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\/cklawreview\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2016\/09\/Watch-Live-Video-CLICK-2016-LawReviewSymposium-300x146.jpg\" alt=\"Watch Live Symposium\" width=\"300\" height=\"146\" srcset=\"https:\/\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\/cklawreview\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2016\/09\/Watch-Live-Video-CLICK-2016-LawReviewSymposium-300x146.jpg 300w, https:\/\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\/cklawreview\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2016\/09\/Watch-Live-Video-CLICK-2016-LawReviewSymposium-768x373.jpg 768w, https:\/\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\/cklawreview\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2016\/09\/Watch-Live-Video-CLICK-2016-LawReviewSymposium-700x340.jpg 700w, https:\/\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\/cklawreview\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2016\/09\/Watch-Live-Video-CLICK-2016-LawReviewSymposium.jpg 875w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Chicago-Kent College of Law<br \/>\n565 West Adams Street<br \/>\nChicago, Illinois 60661<br \/>\nThursday, November 10, 2016<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Much of the existing literature on the unconsented taking of property focuses on constitutional takings rather than on the complete opposite side of the takings spectrum, where property is taken by individuals or states, no (or nominal) compensation is paid, and dehumanization or infantilization result.<\/p>\n<p>The concept of a <strong>dignity takings<\/strong> provides a vocabulary to describe and analyze the takings that poor and vulnerable populations have routinely been subjected to across the globe and in different historical periods; while the concept of <strong>dignity restoration<\/strong> provides a lexicon to discuss attendant remedies necessary and, more importantly, a space to re-imagine their purpose and potential.<\/p>\n<p>The Chicago-Kent Law Review 2016 Live Symposium will extend Chicago-Kent College of Law Professor Bernadette Atuahene\u2019s South African case study presented in <em><a href=\"http:\/\/wewantwhatsours.com\/\">We Want What\u2019s Ours<\/a><\/em> by examining instances of dignity takings and dignity restoration in different contexts.<\/p>\n<p>Additional symposium information can be found below:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"list-style-type: none\">\n<ul>\n<li style=\"list-style-type: none\">\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\/cklawreview\/directions-and-parking\/\">Directions\u00a0and Parking<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\/cklawreview\/dignity-takings-dignity-restoration\/fall-2016-symposium-cle\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Continuing Legal Education credit materials<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>The symposium is free, and lunch is provided for attendees with advance registration.\u00a0Registration is now closed, thank you for your interest.<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\/cklawreview\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2017\/12\/Dignity-Schedule.pdf\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-13930 size-medium\" src=\"https:\/\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\/cklawreview\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2016\/09\/Dignity-Schedule-200x300.png\" alt=\"Dignity Schedule\" width=\"200\" height=\"300\" srcset=\"https:\/\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\/cklawreview\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2016\/09\/Dignity-Schedule-200x300.png 200w, https:\/\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\/cklawreview\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2016\/09\/Dignity-Schedule-768x1152.png 768w, https:\/\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\/cklawreview\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2016\/09\/Dignity-Schedule-683x1024.png 683w, https:\/\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\/cklawreview\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2016\/09\/Dignity-Schedule-700x1050.png 700w, https:\/\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\/cklawreview\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2016\/09\/Dignity-Schedule.png 1200w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 200px) 100vw, 200px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center\"><a href=\"https:\/\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\/cklawreview\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2017\/12\/Dignity-Schedule.pdf\">Download the Symposium flyer<\/a><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h2 style=\"text-align: center\">Schedule<\/h2>\n<table width=\"485\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"131\">8:00 a.m.<\/td>\n<td width=\"223\">REGISTRATION<\/td>\n<td width=\"131\">Front Lobby<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"131\">9:00 a.m.\u20149:15 a.m.<\/td>\n<td width=\"223\">Welcome &amp; Introduction<\/td>\n<td width=\"131\">Auditorium<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"131\">9:15 a.m.\u201410:40 a.m.<\/td>\n<td width=\"223\">Panel 1: Criminal Punishment<\/p>\n<p>John Acevedo, University of La Verne College of Law<br \/>\nAndrew S. Baer, University of Alabama at Birmingham<br \/>\nJoshua Kaiser, Northwestern University<br \/>\nLua Kamal Yuille, University of Kansas School of Law<\/td>\n<td width=\"131\">Auditorium<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"131\">10:40 a.m.\u201410:55 a.m.<\/td>\n<td width=\"223\">BREAK<\/td>\n<td width=\"131\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"131\">10:55 a.m.\u201412:05 p.m.<\/td>\n<td width=\"223\">Panel 2: Wage Theft<\/p>\n<p>Taja-Nia Henderson, Rutgers Law School<br \/>\nRachel Nadas, Law Clerk to the Honorable Frank Montalvo<br \/>\nLaura Beth Nielsen, Northwestern University<br \/>\nC\u00e9sar Rosado Marz\u00e1n, Chicago-Kent College of Law<br \/>\nEsther Sullivan, University of Colorado Denver<\/td>\n<td width=\"131\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"131\">12:05\u00a0p.m.\u20141:35 p.m.<\/td>\n<td width=\"223\">LUNCH<\/td>\n<td width=\"131\">Morris Hall (10<sup>th <\/sup>Floor)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"131\">1:35 p.m.\u20142:30 p.m.<\/td>\n<td width=\"223\">Panel 3: War, Disaster, and Discrimination<\/p>\n<p>Gilat Bachar, Stanford Law School<br \/>\nDiana Guzman-Rodriguez, Stanford Law School<br \/>\nAndrew Kahrl, University of Virginia<\/td>\n<td width=\"131\">Auditorium<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"131\">2:30 p.m.\u20142:45 p.m.<\/td>\n<td width=\"223\">BREAK<\/td>\n<td width=\"131\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"131\">2:45\u00a0p.m.\u20144:45 p.m.<\/td>\n<td width=\"223\">Panel 4: Collective Property<\/p>\n<p>Stephen Engel, Bates College<br \/>\nTimothy Lyle, Iona College<br \/>\nGianpaolo Chiriac\u00f2, Independent Researcher<br \/>\nThomas Joo, University of California, Davis, School of Law<br \/>\nShaun Ossei-Owusu, Columbia Law School<br \/>\nMatthew Shaw, American Bar Foundation &amp; Vanderbilt University<br \/>\nPiotr Stec, University of Opole<\/td>\n<td width=\"131\">Auditorium<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"131\">4:45 p.m.\u20145:00 p.m.<\/td>\n<td width=\"223\">BREAK<\/td>\n<td width=\"131\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"131\">5:00 p.m.\u20146:00 p.m.<\/td>\n<td width=\"223\">Closing Panel<\/p>\n<p>Valerie Hans, Cornell Law School<br \/>\nLasana Harris, University College London<\/td>\n<td width=\"131\">Morris Hall (10<sup>th<\/sup> Floor)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"131\">6:00 p.m.<\/td>\n<td width=\"223\">Closing and Refreshments<\/td>\n<td width=\"131\">Morris Hall (10<sup>th<\/sup> Floor)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<hr \/>\n<h2 style=\"text-align: center\">Panel Participants<\/h2>\n<h3 style=\"font-variant: small-caps;text-align: center\"><\/h3>\n<h3 style=\"font-variant: small-caps;text-align: center\">Panel 1:\u00a0Criminal Punishment<\/h3>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>John Acevedo, Professor of Law, University of La Verne College of Law<\/strong><br \/>\n<em>Dignity Takings in the Criminal Law of the Massachusetts Bay Colony<\/em><\/p>\n<p>This paper examines the issue of when punishment for a crime crosses from being retribution to a dignity taking. From the Norman Conquest until the middle of the eighteenth-century the Common Law of England provided that the property of persons convicted of felonies or treason was forfeited to the crown and their blood corrupted so that their heirs could not inherit; this was in addition to the capital punishment sometimes inflicted upon them. I argue that this is a clear instance of dignity takings. The colonists who traveled to Massachusetts Bay wanted a fresh start and so sought to create a model society based on biblical law as an example of reform for England.<\/p>\n<p>Using over 6,000 criminal cases from the Massachusetts Bay Colony from 1630 to 1688 this paper argues that a different form of dignity takings ensued. The use of \u201cscarlet letters,\u201d pillorying, whipping, and other public displays of punishment were all designed to single out unworthy members of the community. I push Atuahene\u2019s concept of dignity takings by offering a sub-category of dignity abuse where rather than taking or destroying their real and personal property the state seeks to destroy their bodies.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Andrew S. Baer, Assistant Professor, University of Alabama at Birmingham<\/strong><br \/>\n<em>Dignity Restoration and the Chicago Police Torture Reparations Ordinance<\/em><\/p>\n<p>A recent municipal ordinance giving reparations to survivors of police torture in Chicago represents an unprecedented effort by a city government to repair damage wrought by decades of police violence. Between 1972 and 1991, a group of white detectives working under the supervision of Commander Jon Burge tortured confessions from at least 118 black criminal suspects on the city\u2019s South and West Sides. Responding to the needs of affected communities, a coalition of torture survivors, their families, civil rights attorneys, and community activists directed a sustained social movement to push the reparations bill through the City Council on May 6, 2015. Representing the holistic approach favored by activists, the $5 million reparations package awarded each of approximately 60 claimants $100,000 in financial payments; privileged access to psychological counseling, healthcare, and vocational training; as well as tuition-free enrollment in City Colleges for themselves, their children, and grandchildren. The ordinance also required the City offer an apology, erect a public memorial, create a community center to provide services for victims of police violence, and develop a public school curriculum to teach the Burge scandal to 8th\u2013 and 10th-grade students.<\/p>\n<p>Applying concepts developed by Bernadette Atuahene, I argue that the Chicago police torture cases represent a dignity taking designed to dehumanize and infantilize local black people. I also argue that the 2015 reparations ordinance offers a promising new precedent for dignity restoration in cases of police violence in the United States. According to Atuahene, \u201cdignity restoration is based on principles of restorative justice and thus seeks to rehabilitate the dispossessed and reintegrate them into the fabric of society through an emphasis on process\u201d (We Want What\u2019s Ours, 4). Despite limitations of scope and scale, Chicago\u2019s reparations ordinance models ways to include survivors of police violence in the process of repair, commemoration, and education.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Joshua Kaiser, Law and Social Science Fellow, Northwestern University<\/strong><br \/>\n<em>Making the Underclass: Deprivation, Degradation, and America\u2019s Hidden Penal Regime<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Over the last century, the United States has constructed a vast regime of hidden sentences: punishments imposed by law as a direct result of criminalization, but not as part of the formally recognized, judge-issued sentence. Hidden sentences include restrictions on voting rights, public and private employment, governmental benefits, and other rights. Today, there are more than 35,000 hidden sentence laws across the nation that directly impact about one in four American adults. Yet, this penal regime is hidden: policymakers, scholars, lawyers, judges, and even criminalized people themselves are largely unaware that such punishments exist.<\/p>\n<p>This article argues that hidden sentences are dignity takings that create second-class American citizenship. First, I extend Atuahene\u2019s concept of dignity takings to account for denial of access to property and opportunities to acquire it. Thus, hidden sentences that ban criminalized people from public housing, governmental programs, and employment can be dignity takings to the same extent as those that impose fines and forfeitures. Second, I argue that while many of these punishments are arguably dehumanizing and infantilizing, their hiddenness itself makes them all by definition dignity takings. The presumptions that criminalized people do not even deserve notice of their punishments and that courts have no need to consider or care about this lifelong process of criminalization are themselves key symbols that criminalized people are viewed as the undeserving, irresponsible, vile, and base.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Lua Kamal Yuille, Associate Professor of Law, University of Kansas School of Law<\/strong><br \/>\n<em>Dignity Takings in Gangland\u2019s Suburban Frontier<\/em><\/p>\n<p>This paper will engage Bernadette Atuahene\u2019s dignity takings framework in the context of contemporary American street gangs (e.g. Crips, Bloods, Latin Kings, etc.). Contrary to most popular accounts, it starts with a reimagined and complicated notion of street gangs that emphasizes not their secondary or tertiary violence and criminality but their primary function as corporate institutions engaged in the sustained, transgressive creation of alternative markets for the creation of the types of property interests that scholars have associated with the development and pursuit of identity and \u201cpersonhood.\u201d From this perspective, the paper applies the dignity takings analysis to public nuisance abatement actions (commonly known as gang injunctions), which have become standard tools in the national gang strategy. These civil mechanisms enjoin the conduct and activities of the gangs, as unincorporated entities, and prohibit named individuals (including but not limited to known and suspected gang members) from engaging in a panoply of otherwise legal activities: displaying gang symbols, wearing clothing or colors associated with a gang, possessing tools or objects capable of defacing real or personal property (e.g. pens), appearing in public view with a known gang member. Through qualitative analyses of interviews, court documents, and political hearings, the paper demonstrates that the dispossession of identity property associated with suburban gang injunctions depresses self- esteem, erodes self-confidence, damages identity and feelings of community worth, and dehumanizes enjoined individuals in a way that deprives them of their fundamental right of dignity, constituting a clear example of a dignity taking.<\/p>\n<p class=\"jetpack-slideshow-noscript robots-nocontent\">This slideshow requires JavaScript.<\/p><div id=\"gallery-4481-1-slideshow\" class=\"jetpack-slideshow-window jetpack-slideshow jetpack-slideshow-black\" data-trans=\"fade\" data-autostart=\"1\" data-gallery=\"[{&quot;src&quot;:&quot;https:\\\/\\\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\\\/cklawreview\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2016\\\/09\\\/Matthew-Hamielec-20161110-1-683x1024.jpg&quot;,&quot;id&quot;:&quot;13939&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;Matthew Hamielec&quot;,&quot;alt&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;Editor-in-Chief Matthew Hamielec&quot;,&quot;itemprop&quot;:&quot;image&quot;},{&quot;src&quot;:&quot;https:\\\/\\\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\\\/cklawreview\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2016\\\/09\\\/Bernadette-Atuahene-20161110-3-1024x768.jpg&quot;,&quot;id&quot;:&quot;13934&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;Bernadette Atuahene&quot;,&quot;alt&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;Professor Bernadette Atuahene&quot;,&quot;itemprop&quot;:&quot;image&quot;},{&quot;src&quot;:&quot;https:\\\/\\\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\\\/cklawreview\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2016\\\/09\\\/First-Panel-Criminal-Punishment-20161110-4-1024x683.jpg&quot;,&quot;id&quot;:&quot;13935&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;First Panel: Criminal Punishment&quot;,&quot;alt&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;Panel 1&quot;,&quot;itemprop&quot;:&quot;image&quot;},{&quot;src&quot;:&quot;https:\\\/\\\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\\\/cklawreview\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2016\\\/09\\\/John-Acevedo-from-the-Univeristy-of-La-Verne-College-of-Law-20161110-5-1024x683.jpg&quot;,&quot;id&quot;:&quot;13936&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;John Acevedo, from the Univeristy of La Verne College of Law&quot;,&quot;alt&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;Professor of Law John Acevedo&quot;,&quot;itemprop&quot;:&quot;image&quot;},{&quot;src&quot;:&quot;https:\\\/\\\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\\\/cklawreview\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2016\\\/09\\\/Andrew-Baer-from-the-University-of-Birmingham-20161110-6-1024x683.jpg&quot;,&quot;id&quot;:&quot;13933&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;Andrew Baer, from the University of Birmingham&quot;,&quot;alt&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;Assistant Professor Andrew S. Baer&quot;,&quot;itemprop&quot;:&quot;image&quot;},{&quot;src&quot;:&quot;https:\\\/\\\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\\\/cklawreview\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2016\\\/09\\\/Joshua-Kaiser-of-Northwestern-University-20161110-10-1024x768.jpg&quot;,&quot;id&quot;:&quot;13937&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;Joshua Kaiser of Northwestern University&quot;,&quot;alt&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;Law and Social Science Fellow Joshua Kaiser&quot;,&quot;itemprop&quot;:&quot;image&quot;},{&quot;src&quot;:&quot;https:\\\/\\\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\\\/cklawreview\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2016\\\/09\\\/Lua-Kamal-Yuille-of-the-University-of-Kansas-School-of-Law-20161110-12-1024x768.jpg&quot;,&quot;id&quot;:&quot;13938&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;Lua Kamal Yuille of the University of Kansas School of Law&quot;,&quot;alt&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;Associate Professor of Law Lua Kamal Yuille&quot;,&quot;itemprop&quot;:&quot;image&quot;}]\" itemscope itemtype=\"https:\/\/schema.org\/ImageGallery\"><\/div>\n<hr \/>\n<h3 style=\"font-variant: small-caps;text-align: center\">Panel 2:\u00a0Wage Theft<\/h3>\n<p><strong>Taja-Nia Henderson, Professor of Law, Rutgers Law School<\/strong><br \/>\n<em>Dignity Takings and Dignity Restoration Examined through the Lens of American Chattel Slavery<\/em><\/p>\n<p>This paper grapples with the broader applicability of Bernadette Atuahene\u2019s \u201cdignity takings\u201d theory outside the South African context. Atuahene argues that such takings occur \u201cwhen a state directly or indirectly destroys or confiscates property rights from owners or occupiers whom it deems to be sub persons without paying just compensation of without a legitimate public purpose.\u201d (We Want What\u2019s Ours, 3) This essay takes up the challenge posed by Atuahene at the end of Chapter 1 to \u201cexplore whether the concept of dignity takings helps us to better understand\u201d property atrocities in the US, namely, the systematic dispossession of black property rights under chattel slavery and Jim Crow in the US. In this case study, I argue that the remedial reparations inhering in \u201cdignity restoration\u201d require, at base, political will. When such will is absent, or when the dispossessed remain a political or economic underclass, compensation has limited capacity to restore stolen dignity.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Rachel Nadas, Law Clerk to the Honorable Frank Montalvo, U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas<\/strong><br \/>\n<em>Throwaway Lives: Dignity Takings and Foreign-Born Workers in the United States<\/em><\/p>\n<p>In this article, I intend to apply the theoretical framework of dignity takings and dignity restoration to the epidemic of occupational injuries and fatalities among foreign-born workers in the United States. Specifically, I will be relying upon data gleaned from 85 qualitative interviews that I conducted with immigrant day laborers in the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area. These interviews focused on the workers\u2019 personal background, experience with workplace risks, injuries, and illnesses, and familiarity with relevant legal protections.<\/p>\n<p>The paper will position these workplace injuries as a quintessential dignity taking, consistent with Professor Atuahene\u2019s framework. At each stage in the analysis, however, this case study presents intriguing theoretical questions. First, the paper will explore the role of the state in contributing, indirectly, to the property deprivation. The role and responsibility of the state can be gleaned from agency (in)action on workplace safety matters, and from how laws have positioned noncitizens in the U.S. legal system at large. Second, the property deprivation itself presents historical and practical questions relating to how the human body has been commoditized in the workplace setting, and in particular, in the context of workplace injuries. Third, the article will explore how foreign-born workers are treated as more expendable or subhuman in both legal and social discourses. Specifically, considerations of race, class, and immigration status align to diminish the value attached to immigrant worker lives.<\/p>\n<p>Having detailed how dignity takings operate in this context, the article will explore possible models of dignity restoration for foreign-born workers who experience occupational injuries. These include significant reforms to prevention efforts and adjudication\/enforcement processes, allowing the workers to assume a more active and central role. These reforms are intended to affirm the value of immigrant worker lives and underscore the workers\u2019 humanity, while also reshaping societal perceptions of this segment of the workforce.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Laura Beth Nielsen, Professor of Sociology, Northwestern University<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>C\u00e9sar Rosado Marz\u00e1n, Associate Professor of Law, IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law<\/strong><br \/>\n<em>Dignity Takings and \u201cWage Theft\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<p>This paper brings together Atuahene\u2019s concept of \u201cdignity takings\u201d and labor and employment law (\u201clabor law\u201d). It presents original research compiled through interviews and participant observation on how immigrant, low-wage workers are denied their humanity by employers who (1) treat them as commodities and (2) refuse to pay them\u2013 what labor activists call \u201cwage theft.\u201d Since more than a century ago, labor law has been concerned with protecting workers\u2019 dignity, understood to be taken away by employers who treat labor as a commodity. When treated like commodities, workers are denied agency and their human condition. At best, when provided some level of protection by employers, workers are treated paternalistically, as children. When employers refuse to pay workers for their work, workers condition in the labor market begins to resemble compulsory labor, doubly threatening their human dignity.<\/p>\n<p>In this light, labor law understands that workers\u2019 and society\u2019s moral interests lie at stake when labor markets lie unfettered. While labor law generally provides for compensatory damages to workers who suffer wage theft, the concept of \u201cdignity takings\u201d helps to compensate workers for their additional dignity losses. In this fashion, labor law helps to extend \u201cdignity takings\u201d considering the role of commodification, while the concept provides labor law with better remedies to make workers whole.<\/p>\n<p class=\"jetpack-slideshow-noscript robots-nocontent\">This slideshow requires JavaScript.<\/p><div id=\"gallery-4481-2-slideshow\" class=\"jetpack-slideshow-window jetpack-slideshow jetpack-slideshow-black\" data-trans=\"fade\" data-autostart=\"1\" data-gallery=\"[{&quot;src&quot;:&quot;https:\\\/\\\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\\\/cklawreview\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2016\\\/09\\\/Panel-2.jpg&quot;,&quot;id&quot;:&quot;13942&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;4th Panel: Wage Theft&quot;,&quot;alt&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;Panel 2&quot;,&quot;itemprop&quot;:&quot;image&quot;},{&quot;src&quot;:&quot;https:\\\/\\\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\\\/cklawreview\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2016\\\/09\\\/Taj-Nia-Henderson-from-Rutgers-Law-School-20161110-58.jpg&quot;,&quot;id&quot;:&quot;13945&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;Taj-Nia Henderson from Rutgers Law School&quot;,&quot;alt&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;Professor of Law Taja-Nia Henderson&quot;,&quot;itemprop&quot;:&quot;image&quot;},{&quot;src&quot;:&quot;https:\\\/\\\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\\\/cklawreview\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2016\\\/09\\\/Rachel-Nadas-20161110-59.jpg&quot;,&quot;id&quot;:&quot;13944&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;Rachel Nadas&quot;,&quot;alt&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;Judicial Clerk Rachel Nadas&quot;,&quot;itemprop&quot;:&quot;image&quot;},{&quot;src&quot;:&quot;https:\\\/\\\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\\\/cklawreview\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2016\\\/09\\\/Laura-Beth-Neilsen-of-Northwestern-University-20161110-60.jpg&quot;,&quot;id&quot;:&quot;13941&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;Laura Beth Neilsen of Northwestern University&quot;,&quot;alt&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;Professor of Sociology Laura Beth Nielsen&quot;,&quot;itemprop&quot;:&quot;image&quot;},{&quot;src&quot;:&quot;https:\\\/\\\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\\\/cklawreview\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2016\\\/09\\\/Professor-Cesar-Rosado-Marzan-from-Chicago-Kent-20161110-62.jpg&quot;,&quot;id&quot;:&quot;13943&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;Professor Cesar Rosado Marzan from Chicago Kent&quot;,&quot;alt&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;Associate Professor of Law C\\u00e9sar Rosado Marz\\u00e1n&quot;,&quot;itemprop&quot;:&quot;image&quot;}]\" itemscope itemtype=\"https:\/\/schema.org\/ImageGallery\"><\/div>\n<hr \/>\n<h3 style=\"font-variant: small-caps;text-align: center\">Panel 3:\u00a0War, Disaster, and Discrimination<\/h3>\n<p><strong>Gilat Bachar, J.S.D. Candidate, Stanford Law School<\/strong><br \/>\n<em>Access Denied: Barriers to Seeking Civil Justice as a Form of Dignity Taking: Lessons from the Israeli-Palestinian Experience<\/em><\/p>\n<p>The injuring state in armed conflict settings typically does not allow civilian victims on the other side to access its domestic courts in order to seek redress for their injuries. The Israeli-Palestinian conflict presents a rare exception to this rule. A unique mechanism enables Palestinian residents of the West Bank and Gaza Strip to bring claims for damages against the State of Israel before Israeli civil courts. These proceedings might be viewed as a mechanism for dignity restoration, one that both provides a remedy when appropriate and recognizes the individual Palestinian\u2019s equal human worth and autonomy. This research seeks to empirically evaluate this assertion. Using data from content analysis of Israeli civil courts decisions over the last two decades, alongside interviews with relevant stakeholders, the study argues that despite this mechanism\u2019s potential to restore the dignity of Palestinian civilians who suffered bodily injuries and property damages as a result of Israeli military actions, it in fact aggravates the harm they sustained. Not only does the study expand the original dignity taking\/ restoration framework to an amidst-conflict, under-occupation setting, it also proposes a new way to think of the denial of access to civil justice; as another form of dignity taking.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Diana Guzm\u00e1n-Rodr\u00edguez, J.S.D. Candidate, Stanford Law School<\/strong><br \/>\n<em>Dignity Takings and Dignity Restoration:\u00a0A\u00a0Case Study of the Colombian Land Restitution Program<\/em><\/p>\n<p>The Colombian Land Restitution Program, created by the Victims\u2019 Law of 2011, aims to restitute the dispossessed lands to millions of Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs) who were forced to abandon their possessions as they fled the violence of the internal armed conflict. At the same time, it aims to contribute to the transformation of deep inequalities associated with massive forced displacement. This paper assesses to what extent the socio-legal concepts of dignity takings and dignity restoration can contribute to understanding the forced displacement and land dispossession in Colombia, as well as to enhance the land restitution process. The complexities of both land dispossession and land restitution as well as the persistence of the violence associated with the internal armed conflict create an interesting setting to analyze the appropriateness of these concepts.<\/p>\n<p>This case study relies on two main methods. First, a content analysis of judicial rulings issued as part of the program between the beginnings of its implementation in 2012 and June 2014. Secondly, semi-structured interviews with land restitution judges and beneficiaries of the program. The paper argues that although the Colombian case does not meet all the elements of the dignity takings definition, dehumanization accounts for some of the forms of land dispossession occurred in Colombia. Furthermore, it suggests that the concept of dignity restoration can play a significant role in transitional contexts beyond those defined as dignity takings.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Andrew Kahrl, Associate Professor, University of Virginia<\/strong><br \/>\n<em>Dispossession via Taxation: Tax Delinquency and African American Land Loss in the Coastal South<\/em><\/p>\n<p>This paper examines the role of property tax delinquency laws and administrative practices in the meteoric rise of real estate values and equally dramatic decline of African American landownership along southern coastlines in the 1960s and 1970s. Rising property assessments forced many black landowners to sell under duress and, invariably, at far below market value. Of greater significance, though, was the ease with which unscrupulous speculators were able to manipulate the laws on property tax delinquency to seize valuable property from unsuspecting landowners\u2014and unwilling sellers\u2014for pennies on the dollar.<\/p>\n<p>These unethical, but perfectly legal, strategies not only transformed areas like the South Carolina Sea Islands from a cradle of black landownership into a playground for the rich; it also resulted in the wholesale loss of one of the chief sources of potential wealth\u2014land\u2014that black Americans had in their possession when they emerged from a century of Jim Crow. It\u2019s a history of theft and betrayal that remains as invisible to the throngs of middle- and upper-class Americans\u2014white and black\u2014who flock to the South Carolina and Georgia coasts to vacation in luxury hotels and timeshare resorts as it is seared into the collective memory of black Sea Islanders.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Esther Sullivan, Assistant Professor, University of Colorado Denver<\/strong><\/p>\n<p class=\"jetpack-slideshow-noscript robots-nocontent\">This slideshow requires JavaScript.<\/p><div id=\"gallery-4481-3-slideshow\" class=\"jetpack-slideshow-window jetpack-slideshow jetpack-slideshow-black\" data-trans=\"fade\" data-autostart=\"1\" data-gallery=\"[{&quot;src&quot;:&quot;https:\\\/\\\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\\\/cklawreview\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2016\\\/09\\\/Second-Panel-War-_-Discrimination-20161110-28.jpg&quot;,&quot;id&quot;:&quot;13953&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;Second Panel: War \\u0026amp; Discrimination&quot;,&quot;alt&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;Panel 3&quot;,&quot;itemprop&quot;:&quot;image&quot;},{&quot;src&quot;:&quot;https:\\\/\\\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\\\/cklawreview\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2016\\\/09\\\/Panel-3.jpg&quot;,&quot;id&quot;:&quot;13949&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;Panel 3&quot;,&quot;alt&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;Panel 3&quot;,&quot;itemprop&quot;:&quot;image&quot;},{&quot;src&quot;:&quot;https:\\\/\\\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\\\/cklawreview\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2016\\\/09\\\/Gilat-Bachar.jpg&quot;,&quot;id&quot;:&quot;13948&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;Gilat Bachar&quot;,&quot;alt&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;J.S.D. Candidate Gilat Bachar&quot;,&quot;itemprop&quot;:&quot;image&quot;},{&quot;src&quot;:&quot;https:\\\/\\\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\\\/cklawreview\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2016\\\/09\\\/Diana-Guzman-Rodriguez-of-Stanford-Law-School-20161110-18.jpg&quot;,&quot;id&quot;:&quot;13946&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;Diana Guzman-Rodriguez of Stanford Law School&quot;,&quot;alt&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;J.S.D. Candidate Diana Esther Guzm\\u00e1n-Rodr\\u00edguez&quot;,&quot;itemprop&quot;:&quot;image&quot;},{&quot;src&quot;:&quot;https:\\\/\\\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\\\/cklawreview\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2016\\\/09\\\/Andrew-Kahrl-of-the-University-of-Virginia-20161110-22.jpg&quot;,&quot;id&quot;:&quot;13954&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;Andrew Kahrl of the University of Virginia&quot;,&quot;alt&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;Associate Professor Andrew Kahrl&quot;,&quot;itemprop&quot;:&quot;image&quot;},{&quot;src&quot;:&quot;https:\\\/\\\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\\\/cklawreview\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2016\\\/09\\\/Esther-Sullivan-of-the-University-of-Colorado-20161110-23.jpg&quot;,&quot;id&quot;:&quot;13947&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;Esther Sullivan of the University of Colorado&quot;,&quot;alt&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;Assistant Professor Esther Sullivan&quot;,&quot;itemprop&quot;:&quot;image&quot;},{&quot;src&quot;:&quot;https:\\\/\\\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\\\/cklawreview\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2016\\\/09\\\/Professoor-Cesar-Rosado-during-Q_A-20161110-13.jpg&quot;,&quot;id&quot;:&quot;13950&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;Professoor Cesar Rosado during Q\\u0026amp;A&quot;,&quot;alt&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;Panel 3 Audience Questions&quot;,&quot;itemprop&quot;:&quot;image&quot;},{&quot;src&quot;:&quot;https:\\\/\\\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\\\/cklawreview\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2016\\\/09\\\/Professor-Bernadette-Atuahene-leading-the-Q-_-A-panel-20161110-27.jpg&quot;,&quot;id&quot;:&quot;13951&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;Professor Bernadette Atuahene leading the Q \\u0026amp; A panel&quot;,&quot;alt&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;Panel 3 Audience Questions&quot;,&quot;itemprop&quot;:&quot;image&quot;},{&quot;src&quot;:&quot;https:\\\/\\\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\\\/cklawreview\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2016\\\/09\\\/Professor-Taj-Nia-Henderson-during-Q_A-20161110-14.jpg&quot;,&quot;id&quot;:&quot;13952&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;Professor Taj-Nia Henderson during Q\\u0026amp;A&quot;,&quot;alt&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;Panel 3 Audience Questions&quot;,&quot;itemprop&quot;:&quot;image&quot;}]\" itemscope itemtype=\"https:\/\/schema.org\/ImageGallery\"><\/div>\n<hr \/>\n<h3 style=\"font-variant: small-caps;text-align: center\">Panel 4:\u00a0Collective Property<\/h3>\n<p><strong>Stephen Engel, Associate Professor, Bates College<\/strong><br \/>\n<strong>Timothy Lyle, Assistant Professor of English, Iona College<\/strong><br \/>\n<em>Bathhouse Closures as Dignity Takings and <\/em>Obergefell<em> as Dignity Restoration<\/em><\/p>\n<p>When Justice Kennedy announced the ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges (2015), which declared state bans on same-sex marriage unconstitutional, he used the word dignity no less than fifty times. The decision, like the United States v. Windsor (2013) ruling, which declared part of the Defense of Marriage Act unconstitutional, and Lawrence v. Texas (2003), which de-criminalized consensual same-sex sexual relations, utilizes dignity as a rhetorical and substantive foundation. Dissenters and supporters of these rulings critiqued them for straying from principled jurisprudence of equal protection or due process; the rulings yielded uplifting but constitutionally garbled claims. Nevertheless, they deserve critical attention that examines more than whether they conform to doctrinal development. Notably, they also reveal what, in a different context, Bernadette Atuahene names \u201cdignity restoration.\u201d Such restoration \u201ccompensates\u201d for a prior \u201cdignity taking\u201d\u2014when the state deliberately destroys the rights of those deemed as unworthy of legal protection or even acknowledgment.<\/p>\n<p>Specifically, this paper explores how the closing of gay bathhouses during the height of the AIDS crisis is one such dignity taking, one that did substantial cultural and political work to render gay men culpable for their own community\u2019s sudden and relentless demise. It ultimately perpetuated a narrative of culpability, ignited intense divisions within gay and lesbian communities, and produced within gay men a deep distrust and\/or fear of institutions and of one another. While Kennedy\u2019s rulings may be seen as dignity restorative measures, these efforts fail to compensate for the takings suffered by the closing of bathhouses or even by the lack of governmental recognition of the AIDS crisis during the Reagan administration. When these communal spaces were challenged, the logics on which they were premised \u2013 gay liberation, the political imperatives of open and public sexuality, and exploration of new and distinct ways of interpersonal connection \u2013 were denied and denigrated. Insofar as Kennedy\u2019s rulings premise dignity upon the state\u2019s reinforcement of heteronormative couplings, they deny the aims of liberation and fail to acknowledge the value of liberation\u2019s radical critique.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Gianpaolo Chiriac\u00f2, Independent Researcher<\/strong><br \/>\n<em>Sound Recordings and Dignity Taking. Reflections on the Racialization of Migrants in Contemporary Italy<\/em><\/p>\n<p>In the field of ethnomusicology, a discussion around the notion of dignity takings and dignity restoration can provide a fruitful platform to evaluate both our understanding of the cultural values of sounds and the effective results of several projects that have been undertaken under the umbrella of \u201capplied ethnomusicology.\u201d Projects of this kind generally follow the rule of restitution, that is to say that sound recordings made \u201cin the field\u201d and generally archived in big universities or national libraries are now returned to the communities where they have been recorded. In some cases, this phenomenon takes the form of \u201csound repatriation\u201d (Nannyonga and Weintraug 2012), a term that emphasizes the value of music and dance in the postcolonial nation-building process, in other cases the worldwideweb is the arena that provides the space for restitution (e.g. http:\/\/www.culturalequity.org), on the assumption that an online portal is the most democratic form of giving back. Such attempts \u2013 as valuable as they are \u2013 also raised many questions. I want to focus here on one problematic aspect: sound recordings that are returned often carry \u2013 after years in the hands of scholars \u2013 meanings and values that are different from, if not opposite to, meanings and values expressed by the people that have been recorded.<\/p>\n<p>Drawing from two case studies of my own research, I will explore the vocal sounds I have been recording and the agency of people I have recorded through the framework of dignity takings and dignity restoration. A vocalist from Senegal performing a piece on the illegal journey through the Mediterranean Sea and a black vendor on the Southern beach of Apulia (Italy) who uses the voice to catch the attention of summer tourists (http:\/\/www.afrovocality.com\/contemporary-calls\/) provided sound recordings that I used for scholarly articles, videos and installations. Their voices, therefore, have been incorporated in theorizations that delineate my interpretation of their role and practices as people of African origins in contemporary Italy, but do not necessarily represent their values and meanings. I will give my two \u201cinformers\u201d the possibility to articulate whether or not my work caused any dehumanization or infantilization for them or for people of African descent in a Country in which migrants and refugees are often racialized in media and public discourse (Silverstein 2005), misrepresented, and rarely allowed to speak for themselves. I will also give them the possibility to reflect on what can be done in order to mitigate the effects of dignity taking in my work and whether or not anything can be done to restore their dignity. My aim is to provide a model for ethnomusicologists to reflect on their own projects and fieldworks, to move towards methodologies that can be dignifying for every subject involved in the ethnographic work.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Thomas Joo, Martin Luther King Jr. Professor of Law, University of California, Davis, School of Law<\/strong><br \/>\n<em>\u201cA Larger Strategy\u201d? Dignity Takings, Urban Renewal, and Sacramento\u2019s Lost Japantown<\/em><\/p>\n<p>I propose to apply the concept of dignity takings to urban renewal in Sacramento, California, in the 1950s. Like many other cities of that era, Sacramento used eminent domain to make way for federally subsidized private redevelopment of inner-city neighborhoods. Urban renewal tended to displace poor people and people of color, leading James Baldwin to famously deride it as \u201cNegro Removal.\u201d In Sacramento, Japanese Americans were the most obviously identifiable group impacted by urban renewal. The city\u2019s first urban renewal project razed the city\u2019s Japantown. Japanese American residents and business owners had only recently returned from an even more devastating relocation\u2014to domestic concentration camps during World War II.<\/p>\n<p>In 1954, Sacramento\u2019s City Council and its Redevelopment Agency held hearings on the plan to destroy the neighborhood. A well-organized community sent representatives to testify in opposition, to no avail. For my paper, I will review the hearing transcripts, urban renewal planning documents, and other records in Sacramento\u2019s city archives, as well as contemporaneous newspaper coverage. Unlike the South Africans in Atuahene\u2019s original case study, Japanese American property owners received compensation through the same orderly legal process as others. Furthermore, compared to nonwhites in South Africa, state subordination of Japanese Americans was far less blatant. Express statements of racist motivation seem to be absent. The most obvious program of dehumanization\u2014the internment\u2014had ended. But the takings took place against a background of significant anti-Japanese sentiment, as expressed in immigration restrictions, racially restrictive covenants and even racial violence.<\/p>\n<p>A key aspect of dignity takings is their place in \u201ca larger strategy of dehumanization.\u201d This case study will help test and refine the notion of a \u201clarger strategy\u201d and how to establish a sufficient relationship of takings to such a strategy.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Shaun Ossei-Owusu, Academic Fellow, Columbia Law School<\/strong><br \/>\n<em>The Good State Giveth and Taketh Away: Race, Class, and Urban Hospital Closings<\/em><\/p>\n<p>In the past forty years, health care restructuring and privatization has led to the shuttering of large safety-net hospitals in American cities (e.g. Philadelphia, New Orleans, Washington D.C.). This paper applies concepts in Bernadette Atuahene\u2019s We Want What\u2019s Ours to King\/Drew Medical Center \u2013 a major hospital and medical school in South Los Angeles that served African Americans and Latinos. The federal government closed the hospital in 2007 and it reopened in 2015. The essay argues that Atuahene\u2019s notions of dignity takings and restoration offer instructive insights into heath care restructuring, particularly in medically unserved communities. At the same time, it also argues that the health care environment for the medically indigent can also help complement and complicate the concepts in We Want Whats Ours, while offering guidance on how to think about the relationship between race, poverty, property, and health care services.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Matthew Shaw, Assistant Professor of Law, Vanderbilt Law School<\/strong><br \/>\n<em>Creating the Urban Educational Desert through School Closures and Dignity Taking<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Closures of urban open-enrollment neighborhood schools that primarily serve students of color are intensely controversial. Districts seeking to economize often justify closures by pointing to population shifts in historically densely populated urban areas. They argue that net reductions in a neighborhood\u2019s school-aged population result in underutilized schools, which do a disservice to students at higher cost to districts. Students and their families and communities counter, pointing to histories of district neglect of their schools and recent school expansions in more affluent neighborhoods of similar population density as belying district claims of utility-based downsizing.<\/p>\n<p>In this paper, I take community beliefs as a serious frame for understanding neighborhood school closures as a property taking (cf. Garnett, 2014). Through qualitative analyses of interviews, court documents, and school-closure hearings in four urban districts, I show that communities interpret district actions as an abandonment of district obligations to educate their children. I further show that affected communities feel openly disregarded at public closure hearings, which they attribute to district devaluing of their children. I argue that closing schools in this manner compounds the physical property loss with a \u201cdignity taking\u201d (Atuahene, 2014) that leaves an \u201ceducational desert\u201d in its aftermath, with implications for educational outcomes, student affect and engagement, community support, and institutional legitimacy.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Piotr Stec, Professor Extraordinarius, University of Opole<\/strong><br \/>\n<em>Dignity Takings Under Communist Rule In Poland<\/em><\/p>\n<p>The paper will deal with dignity takings in Poland under communist rule and attempted dignity restorations after 1989. At the end of the WWII Poland\u2019s complicated history became even more complicated. Poles who had survived five years of Nazi occupation suddenly found themselves ruled by another totalitarian system. Transformation of Poland into a communist state required creation of a new social system and eradication of all vestiges of the old one. In this brave new world all means of production were to be owned by the state, there would be only one political party and all needs of the people would be fulfilled by the state.<\/p>\n<p>In my paper I will show how an attempt to create a perfect world led to dignity takings not only from people considered \u201cclass enemies,\u201d but also potential beneficiaries of the system. I am going to start with takings of property without compensation which affected not only capitalists and rich landowners, but also charities, small businesses, religious communities and independent farmers. Then I will deal with takings aimed at denigration and humiliation of class enemies, starting from slave labor of so called \u201cminers-soldiers,\u201d through limited access to education, up to policy measures aimed at pauperization of trades and professions traditionally connected with wrong type of people. Next I will discuss measures aimed at limitation of freedom of expression, using the crime of \u201cwhispered propaganda\u201d (i.e. gossiping) as an example. I will try to show, that side effect of those measures was infantilization of workers, who were supposed to be beneficiaries of the change.<\/p>\n<p>Finally I will deal with ways the society tried (sometimes successfully) to resist these takings and attempts of dignity restorations after 1989. I will try to show that this resistance against takings and clemency granted to people responsible for enforcement of the takings facilitated peaceful transition but for a price of leaving some of the takings unrestored.<\/p>\n<p class=\"jetpack-slideshow-noscript robots-nocontent\">This slideshow requires JavaScript.<\/p><div id=\"gallery-4481-4-slideshow\" class=\"jetpack-slideshow-window jetpack-slideshow jetpack-slideshow-black\" data-trans=\"fade\" data-autostart=\"1\" data-gallery=\"[{&quot;src&quot;:&quot;https:\\\/\\\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\\\/cklawreview\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2016\\\/09\\\/Panel-4.jpg&quot;,&quot;id&quot;:&quot;13957&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;3rd Panel: Collective Property&quot;,&quot;alt&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;Panel 4&quot;,&quot;itemprop&quot;:&quot;image&quot;},{&quot;src&quot;:&quot;https:\\\/\\\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\\\/cklawreview\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2016\\\/09\\\/Stephen-Engel-from-Bates-College-20161110-33.jpg&quot;,&quot;id&quot;:&quot;13961&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;Stephen Engel from Bates College&quot;,&quot;alt&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;Associate Professor Stephen Engel&quot;,&quot;itemprop&quot;:&quot;image&quot;},{&quot;src&quot;:&quot;https:\\\/\\\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\\\/cklawreview\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2016\\\/09\\\/Timothy-Lyle-of-Iona-College-20161110-37.jpg&quot;,&quot;id&quot;:&quot;13963&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;Timothy Lyle of Iona College&quot;,&quot;alt&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;Assistant Professor of English Timothy S. Lyle&quot;,&quot;itemprop&quot;:&quot;image&quot;},{&quot;src&quot;:&quot;https:\\\/\\\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\\\/cklawreview\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2016\\\/09\\\/Gianpaolo-Chiriaco-of-Afrovocality-20161110-40.jpg&quot;,&quot;id&quot;:&quot;13955&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;Gianpaolo Chiriaco of Afrovocality&quot;,&quot;alt&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;Researcher Gianpaolo Chiriaco&quot;,&quot;itemprop&quot;:&quot;image&quot;},{&quot;src&quot;:&quot;https:\\\/\\\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\\\/cklawreview\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2016\\\/09\\\/Thomas-Joo-of-the-University-of-California-Davis-School-of-Law-20161110-42.jpg&quot;,&quot;id&quot;:&quot;13962&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;Thomas Joo of the University of California Davis School of Law&quot;,&quot;alt&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;Martin Luther King, Jr. Professor of Law Thomas W. Joo&quot;,&quot;itemprop&quot;:&quot;image&quot;},{&quot;src&quot;:&quot;https:\\\/\\\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\\\/cklawreview\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2016\\\/09\\\/Shaun-Ossei-Owusu-from-Columbia-Law-School-20161110-44.jpg&quot;,&quot;id&quot;:&quot;13960&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;Shaun Ossei-Owusu from Columbia Law School&quot;,&quot;alt&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;Academic Fellow Shaun Ossei-Owusu&quot;,&quot;itemprop&quot;:&quot;image&quot;},{&quot;src&quot;:&quot;https:\\\/\\\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\\\/cklawreview\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2016\\\/09\\\/Matthew-Shaw-of-the-American-Bar-Foundation-_-Vanderbilt-University-20161110-46.jpg&quot;,&quot;id&quot;:&quot;13956&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;Matthew Shaw of the American Bar Foundation \\u0026amp; Vanderbilt Univers&quot;,&quot;alt&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;Assistant Professor of Law Matthew P. Shaw&quot;,&quot;itemprop&quot;:&quot;image&quot;},{&quot;src&quot;:&quot;https:\\\/\\\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\\\/cklawreview\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2016\\\/09\\\/Panel-4-1.jpg&quot;,&quot;id&quot;:&quot;13958&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;3rd Panel: Collective Property&quot;,&quot;alt&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;Shaun Ossei-Owusu and Matthew P. Shaw&quot;,&quot;itemprop&quot;:&quot;image&quot;},{&quot;src&quot;:&quot;https:\\\/\\\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\\\/cklawreview\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2016\\\/09\\\/Piotr-Stec-of-the-University-of-Opole-20161110-48.jpg&quot;,&quot;id&quot;:&quot;13959&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;Piotr Stec of the University of Opole&quot;,&quot;alt&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;Professor Extraordinarius Piotr Stec&quot;,&quot;itemprop&quot;:&quot;image&quot;}]\" itemscope itemtype=\"https:\/\/schema.org\/ImageGallery\"><\/div>\n<hr \/>\n<h3 style=\"font-variant: small-caps;text-align: center\">Closing Panel<\/h3>\n<p><strong>Valerie Hans, Professor of Law, Cornell Law School<\/strong><br \/>\n<strong>Lasana Harris, Senior Lecturer, University College London<\/strong><\/p>\n<p class=\"jetpack-slideshow-noscript robots-nocontent\">This slideshow requires JavaScript.<\/p><div id=\"gallery-4481-5-slideshow\" class=\"jetpack-slideshow-window jetpack-slideshow jetpack-slideshow-black\" data-trans=\"fade\" data-autostart=\"1\" data-gallery=\"[{&quot;src&quot;:&quot;https:\\\/\\\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\\\/cklawreview\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2016\\\/09\\\/Valerie-Hans-of-Cornell-Law-School-20161110-68.jpg&quot;,&quot;id&quot;:&quot;13966&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;Valerie Hans of Cornell Law School&quot;,&quot;alt&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;Professor of Law Valerie Hans&quot;,&quot;itemprop&quot;:&quot;image&quot;},{&quot;src&quot;:&quot;https:\\\/\\\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\\\/cklawreview\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2016\\\/09\\\/Lasana-T.-Harris-from-the-University-College-London-20161110-65.jpg&quot;,&quot;id&quot;:&quot;13964&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;Lasana T. Harris from the University College London&quot;,&quot;alt&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;Senior Lecturer Lasana Harris&quot;,&quot;itemprop&quot;:&quot;image&quot;},{&quot;src&quot;:&quot;https:\\\/\\\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\\\/cklawreview\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2016\\\/09\\\/Symposium-Speakers-20161110-52.jpg&quot;,&quot;id&quot;:&quot;13965&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;Symposium Speakers&quot;,&quot;alt&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;Group picture of Symposium panelists, editor, and organizers&quot;,&quot;itemprop&quot;:&quot;image&quot;}]\" itemscope itemtype=\"https:\/\/schema.org\/ImageGallery\"><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>2016 Chicago-Kent Law Review Live Symposium Dignity Takings | Dignity Restoration Symposium Editor Professor Bernadette Atuahene, IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law &nbsp; Chicago-Kent College of Law 565 West Adams Street Chicago, Illinois 60661 Thursday, November 10, 2016 &nbsp; &nbsp; Much of the existing literature on the unconsented taking of property &#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"parent":649,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-4481","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry","column","twocol"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v28.4 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Dignity Takings | Dignity Restoration - Chicago-Kent Law Review<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"2016 Chicago-Kent Law Review Live Symposium\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\/cklawreview\/symposium\/dignity-takings-dignity-restoration\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Dignity Takings | Dignity Restoration - Chicago-Kent Law Review\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"2016 Chicago-Kent Law Review Live Symposium\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\/cklawreview\/symposium\/dignity-takings-dignity-restoration\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Chicago-Kent Law Review\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/cklawreview\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-10-26T03:55:18+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\/cklawreview\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2016\/09\/Dignity-Header.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@cklawreview\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"24 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\\\/cklawreview\\\/symposium\\\/dignity-takings-dignity-restoration\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\\\/cklawreview\\\/symposium\\\/dignity-takings-dignity-restoration\\\/\",\"name\":\"Dignity Takings | Dignity Restoration - Chicago-Kent Law Review\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\\\/cklawreview\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\\\/cklawreview\\\/symposium\\\/dignity-takings-dignity-restoration\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\\\/cklawreview\\\/symposium\\\/dignity-takings-dignity-restoration\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\\\/cklawreview\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2016\\\/09\\\/Dignity-Header.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2016-09-06T16:17:52+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-10-26T03:55:18+00:00\",\"description\":\"2016 Chicago-Kent Law Review Live Symposium\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\\\/cklawreview\\\/symposium\\\/dignity-takings-dignity-restoration\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\\\/cklawreview\\\/symposium\\\/dignity-takings-dignity-restoration\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\\\/cklawreview\\\/symposium\\\/dignity-takings-dignity-restoration\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\\\/cklawreview\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2016\\\/09\\\/Dignity-Header.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\\\/cklawreview\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2016\\\/09\\\/Dignity-Header.jpg\",\"width\":1200,\"height\":848},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\\\/cklawreview\\\/symposium\\\/dignity-takings-dignity-restoration\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\\\/cklawreview\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Symposium\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\\\/cklawreview\\\/symposium\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Dignity Takings | Dignity Restoration\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\\\/cklawreview\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\\\/cklawreview\\\/\",\"name\":\"Chicago-Kent Law Review\",\"description\":\"Published by the Students of the Chicago-Kent College of Law\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\\\/cklawreview\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Dignity Takings | Dignity Restoration - Chicago-Kent Law Review","description":"2016 Chicago-Kent Law Review Live Symposium","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\/cklawreview\/symposium\/dignity-takings-dignity-restoration\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Dignity Takings | Dignity Restoration - Chicago-Kent Law Review","og_description":"2016 Chicago-Kent Law Review Live Symposium","og_url":"https:\/\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\/cklawreview\/symposium\/dignity-takings-dignity-restoration\/","og_site_name":"Chicago-Kent Law Review","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/cklawreview","article_modified_time":"2018-10-26T03:55:18+00:00","og_image":[{"url":"https:\/\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\/cklawreview\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2016\/09\/Dignity-Header.jpg","type":"","width":"","height":""}],"twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_site":"@cklawreview","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"24 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\/cklawreview\/symposium\/dignity-takings-dignity-restoration\/","url":"https:\/\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\/cklawreview\/symposium\/dignity-takings-dignity-restoration\/","name":"Dignity Takings | Dignity Restoration - Chicago-Kent Law Review","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\/cklawreview\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\/cklawreview\/symposium\/dignity-takings-dignity-restoration\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\/cklawreview\/symposium\/dignity-takings-dignity-restoration\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\/cklawreview\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2016\/09\/Dignity-Header.jpg","datePublished":"2016-09-06T16:17:52+00:00","dateModified":"2018-10-26T03:55:18+00:00","description":"2016 Chicago-Kent Law Review Live Symposium","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\/cklawreview\/symposium\/dignity-takings-dignity-restoration\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\/cklawreview\/symposium\/dignity-takings-dignity-restoration\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\/cklawreview\/symposium\/dignity-takings-dignity-restoration\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\/cklawreview\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2016\/09\/Dignity-Header.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\/cklawreview\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2016\/09\/Dignity-Header.jpg","width":1200,"height":848},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\/cklawreview\/symposium\/dignity-takings-dignity-restoration\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\/cklawreview\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Symposium","item":"https:\/\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\/cklawreview\/symposium\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Dignity Takings | Dignity Restoration"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\/cklawreview\/#website","url":"https:\/\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\/cklawreview\/","name":"Chicago-Kent Law Review","description":"Published by the Students of the Chicago-Kent College of Law","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\/cklawreview\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"}]}},"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/P47W40-1ah","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\/cklawreview\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/4481","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\/cklawreview\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\/cklawreview\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\/cklawreview\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\/cklawreview\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4481"}],"version-history":[{"count":26,"href":"https:\/\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\/cklawreview\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/4481\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":17638,"href":"https:\/\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\/cklawreview\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/4481\/revisions\/17638"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\/cklawreview\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/649"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/studentorgs.kentlaw.iit.edu\/cklawreview\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4481"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}