Page 10 of 11

[NEWS 11/24/2019] Coal Knew of Threat of Climate Change Since 1966

Evidence of what fossil fuel companies knew about the potentially negative impact of fossil fuel combustion on climate change is critical to the legal strategy of those seeking damages for carbon dioxide emissions. If the harmful effects of fossil fuel emissions were known to fossil fuel companies, they potentially could be held liable for damages.[1]

For decades coal companies have denied knowledge of the consequences, as well as the existence of climate change itself. The Huffington Post reported that although Peabody Energy,[2] the largest private-sector coal company in the world, acknowledges climate change on its website, “[i]t has been directly and indirectly involved in obfuscating climate science for decades. It funded dozens of trade, lobbying and front groups that peddled climate misinformation.”[3]

A recently discovered article, however, revealed that the coal industry has known of fossil fuel’s impact on climate change for decades.[4]

Chris Cherry, professor of civil engineering at the University of Tennessee, discovered an article published in the Mining Congress Journal in 1966, written by James R. Garvey, president of Coal Research Inc.[5] An article titled “ramifications of extractive technologies,”[6] revealed the coal industries foreknowledge. Garvey wrote:

There is evidence that the amount of carbon dioxide in the earth’s atmosphere is increasing rapidly as a result of the combustion of fossil fuels . . . [s]uch changes in temperature will cause melting of the polar icecaps, which, in turn, would result in the inundation of many coastal cities, including New York and London. [7]

Most modern knowledge of climate change is seen in the article including increase of average air temperature, melting of polar ice caps, and rising of sea levels.[8] Cherry’s discovery could potentially open the coal industry to similar litigation currently faced by the oil industry.[9]

The Huffington Post reached out to Peabody Energy for comment on the Article’s revelations. A Peabody spokesman stated:

Peabody recognizes that climate change is occurring and that human activity, including the use of fossil fuels, contributes to greenhouse gas emissions. We also recognize that coal is essential to affordable, reliable energy and will continue to play a significant role in the global energy mix for the foreseeable future. Peabody views technology as vital to advancing global climate change solutions, and the company supports advanced coal technologies to drive continuous improvement toward the ultimate goal of near-zero emissions from coal.[10]

*Featured Image: A 1966 issue of the Mining Congress Journal, Courtesy of Chris Cherry

[1] See Elan Young, Coal Knew, Too, Huffington Post (Nov. 22, 2019) https://www.huffpost.com/entry/coal-industry-climate-change_n_5dd6bbebe4b0e29d7280984f (last visited Nov. 22, 2019).

[2] https://www.peabodyenergy.com/.

[3] Élan Young, supra n.1; see Suzanne Goldenberg and Helena Bengtsson, Biggest US coal company funded dozens of groups questioning climate change, Guardian (June 13, 2016), https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2016/jun/13/peabody-energy-coal-mining-climate-change-denial-funding (last visited Nov. 22, 2019).

[4] Eoin Higgins, Coal Knew Too: Explosive Report Shows Industry Was Aware of Climate Threat as Far Back as 1966, Common Dreams (Nov. 22, 2019), https://www.commondreams.org/news/2019/11/22/coal-knew-too-explosive-report-shows-industry-was-aware-climate-threat-far-back-1966 (last visited Nov. 22, 2019).

[5] Id.

[6] Id.

[7] Élan Young, supra n.1

[8] Eoin Higgins, supra n.4.

[9] Id.

[10] Élan Young, supra n.1

[NEWS 11/13/2019] U.S. Withdraws from Paris Agreement

U.S. Withdraws from Paris Agreement

President Donald Trump recently announced that the United States began the process to withdraw from the Paris Agreement.[1] The administration confirmed the withdrawal will be final on November 4, 2020.[2]

The Paris Agreement considered the voluntary national commitments of participating nations in the global reduction of greenhouse gases, to set achievable national goals to combat global climate change and establish a metric for measuring progress in meeting the global goals.[3] Almost 200 countries signed the Paris Agreement in 2015 and pledged to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.[4] The United States was a powerful party in the original agreement.[5] They created language to hold countries accountable for their promises.[6] However, the United States is now the only country to pull out of the global agreement.[7]

According to Andrew Light, a former climate official in the U.S. State Department, “[t]he United States is not cooperating with the rest of the world on dealing with climate change.”[8] Rachel Cleetus of the Union of Concerned Scientists says “[t]he reality is, to really deliver on our climate goals, we do need strong federal action.”[9]

Michael R. Pompeo, Secretary of State, stated in his press statement despite the withdrawal from the Paris Agreement, “[The United States] will continue to work with our global partners to enhance resilience to the impacts of climate change and prepare for and respond to natural disasters . . . the United States will continue to research, innovate, and grow our economy while reducing emissions and extending a helping hand to our friends and partners around the globe.”[10]

[1] David Roberts, The Paris climate agreement is at risk of falling apart in the 2020s, Vox (November 5, 2019), https://www.vox.com/energy-and-environment/2019/11/5/20947289/paris-climate-agreement-2020s-breakdown-trump (last visited November 7, 2019).

[2] Id.

[3] David Roberts, The Conceptual breakthrough behind the Paris climate treaty, Vox (December 15, 2015), https://www.vox.com/2015/12/15/10172238/paris-climate-treaty-conceptual-breakthrough (last visited November 8, 2019).

[4] Rebecca Hersher, U.S. Formally Begins to Leave the Paris Climate Agreement, NPR (November 4, 2019), https://www.npr.org/2019/11/04/773474657/u-s-formally-begins-to-leave-the-paris-climate-agreement (last visited November 8, 2019).

[5] See Id.

[6] Id.

[7] Id.

[8] Id.

[9] Id.

[10] Michael R. Pompeo, On the U.S. Withdrawal from the Paris Agreement, U.S. Department of State (November 4, 2019), https://www.state.gov/on-the-u-s-withdrawal-from-the-paris-agreement/ (last visited November 7, 2019).

[NEWS 11/13/2019] Leadership Shake-Up at Department of Energy and Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Leadership Shake-Up at Department of Energy and Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

On Thursday November 7, 2019, the Trump Administration officially nominated Dan Brouillette to succeed Rick Perry as the U.S. Energy Secretary.[1] Secretary Perry’s ties to the ongoing investigation into President Trump’s communications with the President of Ukraine, Volodymyr Zelensky, foreshadowed Perry’s resignation.[2]  An official date of resignation has not yet been set, but Secretary Perry is expected to step down before the end of the year.[3]

Under his previous appointment as the Deputy Energy Secretary, Brouillette was responsible for leading the day-to-day operations at the Department of Energy (“DOE”). He has also held prior government positions as the Chief of Staff for the House Committee on Energy and Commerce, the Assistant Secretary of congressional affairs for the DOE, under President George W. Bush, and a member of the Louisiana State Mineral and Energy Board.[4] Chairman of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), released a statement expressing her confidence that Brouillette “will excel in this new role.”[5]

In other federal energy news, on November 5, 2019, the Senate Energy and Natural Resource Committee questioned James Danly, the White House nominee, vying for one of two commissioner vacancies on the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”).[6] FERC is an independent, bipartisan regulatory agency tasked with regulating the interstate transmission of electricity, natural gas, and oil.[7] Danly is currently serving as the general counsel for FERC. His appointment would end the regulatory bottleneck resulting from FERC’s inability to meet the quorum requirements to take an official vote on pending decisions.[8]  However, there will still be one vacant commissioner seat to be filled by a Democratic-appointee, which the Trump Administration has yet to announce a nomination.

Featured Image: Mari Yamaguchi/AP Photo

[1] Humeyra Pamuk, Trump nominates former Ford executive to be new U.S. energy secretary, Reuters (Nov. 7, 2019),  https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-brouillette/trump-nominates-former-ford-executive-to-be-new-u-s-energy-secretary-idUSKBN1XI022?feedType=RSS&feedName=topNews&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+reuters%2FtopNews+%28News+%2F+US+%2F+Top+News%29 (last visited Nov. 8, 2019).

[2] Maggie Haberman and Lisa Friedman, Perry to Resign as Energy Secretary, The New York Times (Oct. 17, 2019), https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/17/us/politics/rick-perry-energy-secretary-resigns.html?module=inline (last visited Nov. 8, 2019).

[3] Id.

[4] Lisa K. Friedman and Mariel Padilla, Trump Taps Dan Brouillette to Succeed Rick Perry as Energy Secretary, The New York Times (Oct. 18, 2019),  https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/18/us/politics/dan-brouillette-energy-secretary-rick-perry.html (last visited Nov. 8, 2019).

[5] Press Release, United States Senator for Alaska Lisa Murkowski, Murkowski Welcomes Nomination of Dan Brouillette to be Secretary of Energy (Oct. 21, 2019), https://www.murkowski.senate.gov/press/release/murkowski-welcomes-nomination-of_dan-brouillette-to-be-secretary-of-energy (last visited Nov. 8, 2019).

[6] Iulia Gheorghiu, Sen. Manchin ‘fighting’ for White House nomination of Democratic FERC candidate, Utility Dive (Nov. 6, 2019), https://www.utilitydive.com/news/sen-manchin-fighting-for-white-house-nomination-of-democratic-ferc-candi/566722/ (last visited Nov. 8, 2019).

[7] FERC, About FERC: What FERC Does, https://www.ferc.gov/about/ferc-does.asp (last visited Nov. 8, 2019).

[8] Iulia Gheorghiu, Trump bucks bipartisan tradition with plan to nominate Republican FERC commissioner, Utility Dive (Oct. 2, 2019), https://www.utilitydive.com/news/trump-picks-Republican-Danly-FERC-nominee-sans-Democrat-pre-clearance-Clements-Schumer-Manchin/564149/ (last visited Nov. 8, 2019).

[NEWS 10/28/2019] Illinois EPA Solicits Public Input for Coal Ash Rulemaking

Illinois EPA Solicits Public Input for Coal Ash Rulemaking

The Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (“IEPA”) recently concluded a series of stakeholder meetings, which sought public input on the development of rules related to the mitigation and remediation of coal ash ponds.[1]  Coal combustion residual surface impoundments, commonly known as “coal ash ponds,” are repositories for the potentially harmful byproducts of coal-powered electric generation facilities.[2]

A 2018 report compiled by EarthJustice, Prairie Rivers Network, Environmental Integrity Project, and the Sierra Club found that 22 out of 24 coal ash ponds in Illinois release toxic pollutants (including arsenic, cobalt, and lithium) into the groundwater.[3]  In the wake of these findings, Illinois governor JB Pritzker signed the Coal Ash Pollution Prevention Act (the “Act”) into law in July 2019.[4]  The Act prohibits the discharge of coal ash into the environment and establishes a regulatory framework designed to ensure industry compliance.[5]  The Act provides guidelines for the construction, operation, and closure of all Illinois coal ash plants currently in operation. The guidelines also set forth the requirements for monitoring contamination levels and any future on-site remediation.

The IEPA hosted its final stakeholder meeting on October 9, 2019 in Waukegan, Illinois. The next step for the Agency is to consolidate the feedback, and draft a rule for public comment.  The IEPA anticipates publishing the draft rule in November or December 2019.  A final version of the rule must be submitted for approval to the Illinois Pollution Control Board by March 30, 2020.[8]

[1] Alex Ortiz, Illinois EPA to host meeting on coal ash pollution in Joliet, The Herald-News (Oct. 5, 2019), available at https://www.theherald-news.com/2019/10/03/illinois-epa-to-host-meeting-on-coal-ash-pollution-in-joliet/aoppp1p/.

[2] Coal Combustion Residual Surface Impoundments, Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, https://www2.illinois.gov/epa/topics/water-quality/watershed-management/ccr-surface-impoundments/Pages/default.aspx (last visited Oct. 25, 2019).

[3] Earthjustice, Prairie Rivers Network, Environmental Integrity Project & Sierra Club, Cap and Run: Toxic Coal Ash Left Behind by Big Polluters Threatens Illinois Water (Nov. 27, 2018), available at https://earthjustice.org/news/press/2018/new-report-reveals-severe-groundwater-contamination-at-illinois-coal-ash-dumps.

[4] Alex Ruppenthal, Illinois Becomes Latest State to Crack Down on Coal Ash Pollution (July 31, 2019), available at https://news.wttw.com/2019/07/31/illinois-becomes-latest-state-crack-down-coal-ash-pollution.

[5] See 415 ILCS 5/22.59 (2019).

[6] See 40 C.F.R. § 257, Subpart D (2019).

[7] Coal Combustion Residual Surface Impoundments, Illinois Environmental Protection Agency,  https://www2.illinois.gov/epa/topics/water-quality/watershed-management/ccr-surface-impoundments/Pages/default.aspx (last visited Oct. 25, 2019).

[8] Id.

[NEWS 10/28/2019] Michigan Lawmakers Fight to Introduce New Energy Diversity Bills

Michigan Lawmakers Continue to Consider Legislation to Diversify Electricity Sources.

Four, bipartisan state bills were introduced in 2014, in an attempt to diversify Michigan’s energy sources.[1] The bills tackled fair value pricing, net metering enhancements, community renewable energy gardens, and microgrids.[2] Despite having bipartisan support, the bills failed to make it out of committee during the past three legislative sessions.

Lawmakers have introduced a new series of bills named Powering Michigan Forward.[3] The proposed bill would eliminate current regulatory blocks that hinder the future growth of Michigan’s solar energy market.[4] The bill’s sponsors argue that the “package gives residents of Michigan’s Upper Peninsula energy freedom,” that it will support community jobs—ultimately, helping the “district’s economy continue its forward momentum.”[5] With the introduction of these bills, Michigan state legislators hope to increase residential, commercial, and industrial communities’ access to clean and affordable energy options.[6]

While clean energy developers and local business interest groups support the proposed legislation, Consumers Energy opposes the bills believing that the implementation costs are disproportionate, and “customers should pay their fair share to ensure reliability and affordability of the energy grid.”[7] DTE, a holding company established by Detroit Edison, was also concerned by the proposed legislation because,  while the push toward small power may be beneficial for certain customers or conditions, “they continue to be expensive and have incremental benefits when you consider broader issues.”[8]

[1] Andy Balaskovitz, Bipartisan ‘energy freedom’ bills resurface in Michigan, one at a time, Energy News Network (October 22, 2019), https://energynews.us/2019/10/22/midwest/bipartisan-energy-freedom-bills-resurface-in-michigan-one-at-a-time/ (last visited October 24, 2019).

[2] Andy Balaskovitz, Michigan legislators seek ‘energy freedom’ for consumers, Energy News Network (July 22, 2014) https://energynews.us/2014/07/22/midwest/michigan-legislators-seek-energy-freedom-for-consumers/ (last visited October 24, 2019).

[3] Megan Schellong, Lawmakers introduce renewable energy bills, WLNS (October 22, 2019), https://www.wlns.com/news/lawmakers-introduce-renewable-energy-bills/ (last visited October 24, 2019)

[4] Id.

[5] Fox 47 News, Bills introduced to improve clean energy, Fox News (October 22, 2019), https://www.fox47news.com/news/local-news/bills-introduced-to-improve-clean-energy (last visited October 24, 2019).

[6] Id.

[7] Robert Walton, DTE, Consumers Energy push back on Michigan legislators’ plan to rewrite 2016 energy law, Utility Dive (October 23, 2019), https://www.utilitydive.com/news/dte-consumers-energy-push-back-on-michigan-legislators-plan-to-rewrite-20/565642/ (last visited October 24, 2019).

[8] Id.

[NEWS, Oct. 12, 2019] Threat of Wildfire Prompts California Utility Companies to Cut Power to Customers

Threat of Wildfire Prompts California Utility Companies to Cut Power to Customers

On Wednesday, October 9, Pacific Gas & Electric Company (PG&E) began shutting off power to nearly 800,000 customers in northern California. PG&E stated that the outages were necessary to preempt the risk of wildfires brought on by severe weather conditions like high winds and hot, dry air throughout the company’s service area.[1] At the time PG&E initiated the outages, the company anticipated that some customers could be without power for days.[2]

Southern California Edison Company (SCE), the largest utility provider in south-central California, including Los Angeles County, announced on Thursday, October 10, that it would start cutting power to customers in light of the hazardous conditions caused by the Santa Ana winds.[3]  The same day, wildfires broke out in SCE’s service area in Riverside County, east of Los Angeles.[4]  SCE anticipates that over 200,00 customers may be affected by the power outages.[5]

These controlled blackouts, also known as “preemptive de-energizations,” are the foundation of PG&E and SCE’s Public Safety Power Shut-off programs (PSPS), which are part of a comprehensive effort to reduce the risk of electrical infrastructure sparking fires. This is accomplished by temporarily turning off power to specific areas.[6] Following the wildfires that devastated parts of California in 2017 and 2018, the California PUC ordered electric utility companies to submit Wildfire Mitigation Plans[7] and this past summer, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed a law that provides $21.5 billion in funding to help utilities pay for wildfire damage, and make upgrades to the electric infrastructure.[8] The California State Legislature, the California Public Utilities Commission (California PUC), and electric utility companies have, in turn, intensified their efforts to improve the safety of electric infrastructure as the threat of seasonal wildfires is exacerbated by changing climate. Dangerous weather conditions have started to subside, though line inspections may delay power returning to some PG&E customers for up to five days[9] and the fires in Riverside County continue to burn.[10]

Featured Image: National Weather Service Sacramento

[1] See Press Release, PG&E Begins to Proactively Turn Off Power for Safety to Nearly 800,000 Customers Across Northern and Central California, Pacific Gas & Electric Company (Oct. 9, 2019), https://www.pge.com/en/about/newsroom/newsdetails/index.page?title=20191009_pge_begins_to_proactively_turn_off_power_for_safety_to_nearly_800000_customers_across_northern_and_central_california (last visited Oct. 9, 2019).

[2] Id.

[3] See Press Release, , Santa Ana Winds Prompt SCE Public Safety Power Shutoffs in Some Southland Areas, Southern California Edison Company (Oct. 10, 2019), https://energized.edison.com/stories/santa-ana-winds-prompt-sce-public-safety-power-shutoffs-in-some-southland-areas.

[4] See Joseph Serna, Hannah Fry, & Alejandra Reyes-Velarde, Numerous Riverside County homes destroyed by fire; SoCal Edison cuts power to thousands, The Los Angeles Times (Oct. 10, 2019), https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2019-10-10/l-a-faces-critical-fire-danger-possible-power-outages-as-santa-ana-winds-buffet-southern-california (last visited Oct. 10, 2019).

[5] See Public Safety Power Shutoffs, Current Status, Southern California Edison Co (effective Oct. 11, 2019), https://www.scemaintenance.com/content/sce-maintenance/en/psps.html (last visited Oct. 11, 2019).

[6] See Rulemaking 18-12-005, Decision Adopting De-Energization (Public Safety Power Shutoff) Guidelines (Phase I Guidelines), California PUC, p. 3 (issued May 30, 2019).

[7] See Rulemaking 18-10-007, Order Instituting Rulemaking to Implement Electric Utility Wildfire Mitigation Plans Pursuant to Senate Bill 901 (2018), California PUC (issued Oct. 25, 2018).

[8] See Alejandro Lazo & Katherine Blunt, California Legislature Approves Multibillion-Dollar Wildfire Fund, The Wall Street Journal (July 11, 2019), https://www.wsj.com/articles/california-legislature-approves-multibillion-dollar-wildfire-fund-11562870591 (last visited Oct. 11, 2019).

[9] See Thomas Fuller, Californians Confront a Blackout Induced to Prevent Blazes, The New York Times (Oct. 10, 2019), https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/10/us/pge-outage.html (last visited Oct. 11, 2019).

[10] Incident Overview, California Department of Fire & Forestry Protection, https://www.fire.ca.gov/incidents/ (last visited Oct. 11, 2019).

[NEWS, Oct. 12, 2019] Iceberg More Than Twice the Size of Chicago Breaks Off Antarctica

Iceberg More Than Twice the Size of Chicago Breaks Off Antarctica

On September 26, 2019, an iceberg measuring 632 square miles, weighing 315 billion tons, calved from an ice shelf in east Antarctica.[1] Calving is the sudden release of ice from the edge of a glacier, iceberg, or ice shelf. This event is the first major calving on the Amery ice shelf in over 50 years.[2]

Scientists do not attribute this large break of ice to climate change—despite it being the largest event in decades. Helen Amanda Fricker, a professor at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography, states, “It’s part of the ice shelf’s normal cycle, where we see major calving events every 60-70 years.”[3]

While this event is not believed to be a direct result of climate change, calving in other areas is beginning to increase in depth and speed. Sue Cook from the Institute of Marine and Antarctic Studies expects iceberg calving incidents to increase in coming years due to climate change.[4] Cook explains, “There are a number of different processes that’ll happen . . . [a]s waters around Antarctica warm up, they’ll start thinning the ice shelves and making them more vulnerable to breaking up.”[5]

Featured Image: COPERNICUS DATA/SENTINEL-1/@STEFLHERMITTE, https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-49885450.

[1] See Lisa Cox, Giant iceberg breaks off east Antarctica, The Guardian (Sept. 30, 2019), https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/oct/01/giant-iceberg-breaks-off-east-antarctica (last visited Oct. 10, 2019); Jonathan Amos, 315 billion-tonne iceberg breaks off Antarctica, BBC News (Sept. 30, 2019), https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-49885450 (last visited Oct. 11, 2019).

[2] Id.

[3] Id.

[4] See Carly Cassella, A Giant Iceberg Just Broke Off Antarctica in an Unexpected Location, Science Alert (Oct, 2, 2019), https://www.sciencealert.com/a-giant-iceberg-has-just-broken-off-antarctica-and-it-s-bigger-than-expected (last visited Oct. 10, 2019).

[5] Id.

[UPDATE, Oct. 7, 2019] Congratulations to New JEEL Team Members.

Congratulations to New JEEL Team Members:

 

Associate Editors:

Associate Research Editors:
Chloe Bell Hannah Bucher
Jason Clark Megan Janowiak
Kenneth Walther

 

 

[NEWS, Sept. 23, 2019] 2019 United Nations Secretary-General’s Climate Action Summit in New York.

“The Climate Emergency is a Race We are Losing, But It is a Race We Can Win.” [1]

Monday Morning, UN Secretary-General António Guterres set the stage for the summit by declaring that “This is not a climate talk summit. We have had enough talk. This is not a climate negotiation summit. You don’t negotiate with nature. This is a climate action summit.” Government, business, and civil society leaders from over 200 countries are meeting today to deliver “new pathways and practical actions to shift global response into higher gear.”[2]

The topics that the summit is covering, include: (1) Increased Ambition and Accelerated Action in meeting Paris commitments (2) Climate Finance (3) Unlocking the Potential of Nature in Climate Action (4) Live, Work, and Move Green (5) Assistance for the Least Developed Countries (6) Small Island Developing Sites (7) Cutting GHG Emissions Now with Cooling and Energy Efficiency (8) A Resilient Future, Making People Safer (9) People Centered Action, and (10) Moving Economy from Grey to Green.[3]

While the Summit leaders encourage active participation from all the attending nations, some of the largest national economies—Australia, Japan, South Korea, Brazil, and the U.S.—will not be given an opportunity to participate in the discussions because of their continuing support for the expansion of coal plants in their nations.[4] Guterres said that by denying some nations from participating the Summit sends a message that “governments are either part of the problem or part of the solution.”[5]

A full list of the announcements and commitments made at the Climate Action Summit can be found at www.un.org/climatechange.

*Featured Image: https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/climate-action/

[1] UN Climate Action Summit Team, UN Climate Action Summit 2019 Main Press Release (Sept. 23, 2019), https://www.un.org/en/climatechange/assets/pdf/CAS_main_release.pdf (statement of UN Secretary General António Guterres).

[2] Id.

[3] Id.

[4] Jessica F. Green, The U.N. Climate Summit starts today. Here’s what it can—and can’t—achieve (Sept. 23, 2019), https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/09/23/un-climate-summit-starts-today-heres-what-it-can-cant-achieve/.

[5] Id.

[NEWS, Sept. 20, 2019] All Over the World, Millions of Student Protesters Hit the Streets Calling for Immediate Action to Combat Global Climate Change

More than 4 million people all across the globe went to the streets today calling on their governments to take immediate action to combat global climate change. The first rallies began shortly after sun rise in Australia, and then spread through the Pacific islands to India, Turkey, across Europe, finally landing in the United States.

The unprecedented youth turn out is largely attributed to 16-year-old Swedish activist Greta Thunberg who launched the movement “Fridays for Future” last year.[1] According to Euro News, “a total of 1,718 climate actions were planned throughout the globe, including 948 in Europe,”[2] and more than 800 marches were launched in the U.S.[3]

*Featured Image: Sydelle Willow Smith for The New York Times (Sept. 20, 2019).

[1] Rafael Cereceda, Millions of Young People March for Climate in Historic Mobilisation, EuroNews (Sept. 20, 2019), https://www.euronews.com/2019/09/20/global-climate-strikes-kick-off-ahead-of-un-summit-on-climate-change (last visited Sept. 20, 2019).

[2] Id.

[3] Scott Neuman and Bill Chappell, ‘We’re Young, But We’re Not Dumb’: Millions March In Global Climate Strike, NPR (Sept. 20, 2019), https://www.npr.org/2019/09/20/762629200/mass-protests-in-australia-kick-off-global-climate-strike-ahead-of-u-n-summit (last visited Sept. 20, 2019).

Page 10 of 11

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén